Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932931AbXLNCBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:01:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760943AbXLNCBH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:01:07 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.235]:58122 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759694AbXLNCBF (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:01:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Gk2cWw2x03R+OuXSFnVYGLcmwje5jT41MhzSvWZ0De8YwTS5c+5CBCTm+sadmm3HmWehAJKDxxwAcM/uqJiTx36HaaZ539fIBi2YlNEbIQ5ztygG6CG5Eg37XNQEYYFRrHy6jid8L3n5WahLznk7QAGHTsjuUqPgNdxo1zpWbRg= Message-ID: <9c9fda240712131801w5aec854eg71f3dc7ad49ddeb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:01:03 +0900 From: "Kyungmin Park" To: "Pierre Ossman" Subject: Re: [PATCH][MMC] Fix wrong EXT_CSD_REV handling Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20071213092437.7aa2b928@poseidon.drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071213071311.GA2970@party> <20071213085332.18d2790d@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <9c9fda240712130008s227a77dsbd9333c5227d51eb@mail.gmail.com> <20071213092437.7aa2b928@poseidon.drzeus.cx> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 44ad475f1634e31f Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 24 On Dec 13, 2007 5:24 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:08:16 +0900 > "Kyungmin Park" wrote: > > > > > In my MMC Spec. (v4.2), there's no problem to read it even though it's > > revision 1.1 > > > > Well, the spec says that those reserved fields "should be zero". Unfortunately, people seem to have read this in the IETF sense and not as "the fields MUST be zero". I.e. I've seen cards where reserved fields contain junk. > Yes, reserved word should or must be zero, then it should check "if (ext_csd_struct <= 2)" instead of ">= 2". In the Spec. 4.2, it can have three value 0, 1, or 2. There's no other restriction. Thank you, Kyungmin Park. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/