Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-27448-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <cd7dc93f-ade9-6403-a732-2daca8e6cff9@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:35:22 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] Clean up perf mem
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, acme@kernel.org,
        irogers@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
        john.g.garry@oracle.com, will@kernel.org, james.clark@arm.com,
        mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
        yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
        tmricht@linux.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com,
        atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
References: <20231213195154.1085945-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
 <a0abfee5-4dcd-3eb5-82fe-1a0dcdade038@linux.ibm.com>
 <befb6acd-86be-4255-af96-38865affc56c@linux.intel.com>
 <8bfadc86-e137-4a9f-a9ce-0bc62464c195@linux.intel.com>
 <057a1c19-3117-1aec-41d6-4950c599b862@linux.ibm.com>
 <692e16f9-062c-4b3c-bd66-a16bac68216c@linux.intel.com>
From: kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <692e16f9-062c-4b3c-bd66-a16bac68216c@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 1/5/24 20:08, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024-01-05 1:38 a.m., kajoljain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/24 01:38, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>> Hi Kajol Jain
>>>
>>> On 2023-12-19 9:15 a.m., Liang, Kan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-19 4:26 a.m., kajoljain wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>   I was trying to test this patchset on powerpc.
>>>>>
>>>>> After applying it on top of acme's perf-tools-next branch, I am getting
>>>>> below error:
>>>>>
>>>>>   INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
>>>>>   INSTALL libperf_headers
>>>>>   INSTALL libsymbol_headers
>>>>>   INSTALL libapi_headers
>>>>>   INSTALL libbpf_headers
>>>>>   CC      arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.o
>>>>> In file included from arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c:3:
>>>>> arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h:5:52: error: ‘PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX’
>>>>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>>>>>     5 | extern struct perf_mem_event
>>>>> perf_mem_events_power[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX];
>>>>>       |
>>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> make[6]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:105:
>>>>> arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.o] Error 1
>>>>> make[5]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: util]
>>>>> Error 2
>>>>> make[4]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: powerpc]
>>>>> Error 2
>>>>> make[3]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: arch]
>>>>> Error 2
>>>>> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:693: perf-in.o] Error 2
>>>>> make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:251: sub-make] Error 2
>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems some headerfiles are missing from arch/powerpc/util/mem-
>>>>> events.c
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Leo updated the headerfiles for ARM. https://termbin.com/0dkn
>>>>
>>>> I guess powerpc has to do the same thing. Could you please try the below
>>>> patch?
>>>
>>>
>>> Does the patch work on powerpc?
>>
>> Hi Kan,
>>    Sorry I went for vacation so couldn't update. Yes this fix works. 
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
>> But
>> we have another issue, actually this patch set changes uses ldlat
>> attribute. But ldlat is not supported in powerpc because of which perf
>> mem is failing in powerpc.
> 
> For powerpc, the patch 3 introduced a perf_mem_events_power, which
> doesn't have ldlat. But it only be assigned to the pmu->is_core. I'm not
> sure if it's the problem.

Hi Kan,
 Correct there were some small issues with patch 3, I added fix for that.

> Also, S390 still uses the default perf_mem_events, which includes ldlat.
> I'm not sure if S390 supports the ldlat.

I checked it, I didn't find ldlat parameter defined in arch/s390
directory. I think its better to make default ldlat value as false
in tools/perf/util/mem-events.c file.

Thanks,
Kajol Jain

> 
> Thanks,
> Kan
>>
>> I am looking into a work around to fix this issue. I will update the fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kajol Jain
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kan
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
>>>> b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
>>>> index 72a6ac2b52f5..765d4a054b0a 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>>>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> -#include "map_symbol.h"
>>>> +#include "util/map_symbol.h"
>>>> +#include "util/mem-events.h"
>>>>  #include "mem-events.h"
>>>>
>>>>  #define E(t, n, s, l, a) { .tag = t, .name = n, .event_name = s, .ldlat
>>>> = l, .aux_event = a }
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kan
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Kajol Jain
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/14/23 01:21, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since V2:
>>>>>> - Fix the Arm64 building error (Leo)
>>>>>> - Add two new patches to clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
>>>>>>   and perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus() (Leo)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since V1:
>>>>>> - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
>>>>>> - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
>>>>>> - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
>>>>>> - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
>>>>>>   (Arnaldo)
>>>>>> - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
>>>>>> perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
>>>>>> ARCH specific ones.
>>>>>> Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
>>>>>> mem-events.c for each ARCH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no functional change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
>>>>>> etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
>>>>>> Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the test results:
>>>>>> Intel hybrid machine:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>>>>> ldlat-loads  : available
>>>>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>>>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -v
>>>>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>>>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Intel SPR:
>>>>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>>>>> ldlat-loads  : available
>>>>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>>>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -v
>>>>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>>>>> calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kan Liang (7):
>>>>>>   perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
>>>>>>   perf mem: Clean up perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus()
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c            |   3 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c   |  39 +---
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.h   |   7 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c |  13 +-
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h |   7 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c        |  11 ++
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c           |   3 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c     |  99 ++--------
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.h     |  10 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c            |  19 +-
>>>>>>  tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c                  |  45 ++---
>>>>>>  tools/perf/builtin-mem.c                  |  48 ++---
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.c              | 217 +++++++++++++---------
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.h              |  19 +-
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/pmu.c                     |   4 +-
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/pmu.h                     |   7 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/pmus.c                    |   6 -
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/pmus.h                    |   1 -
>>>>>>  18 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.h
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
>>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>