Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29256-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:09:02 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	hirokazu.yamauchi.hk@hitachi.com, ddouwsma@redhat.com,
	loberman@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length
Message-ID: <ZagJrod33CPFaXGg@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <20231215193954.1785069-1-audra@redhat.com>
 <20240115170822.451231-1-audra@redhat.com>
 <ZabLkep0gOFEyjxH@slm.duckdns.org>
 <Zafm-hkCI4sbOr78@fedora>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zafm-hkCI4sbOr78@fedora>

Hello,

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Audra Mitchell wrote:
> Thank you for the response. May I humbly mention that I did find the following
> while testing my patch:
> 
> [    0.120298] workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN (32 chars). Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien
> 
> In an effort to be thorough, would you like me to submit a patch shortening
> this? Perhaps to "events_freezable_pwr_efficient"?
> 
> To be clear, I am not pushing the change, however, I do want to make sure that
> the changes being submitted are not causing additional clutter. 

Oh yeah, please go ahead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun