Received: by 2002:a05:7412:ba23:b0:fa:4c10:6cad with SMTP id jp35csp29135rdb; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:03:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGYISuvi9Vs2rmglfvYDe91paTZPsPyLOPN957pSJHQzQKMDqWbTBGQKqU1Yeo72dCypGhG X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3287:b0:19b:624c:c7bc with SMTP id yt7-20020a056a21328700b0019b624cc7bcmr36769pzb.118.1705536209768; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:03:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j191-20020a638bc8000000b005ce08b3fe78si438701pge.126.2024.01.17.16.03.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29563-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hugovil.com header.s=x header.b=xX3Ez3sn; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29563-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-29563-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14FD1B26624 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65383C04; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="xX3Ez3sn" Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F706658; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705536064; cv=none; b=ki6wX9o+MysuPbCSPl72aZtMGlcPQVXEAe6grXcq0QTrUXJ4olMpCytjmSM/0NGRlCCuek1c76dsq0/zYTEDfBs71AnQNtU0s23lH0ejCXr9Ev3pxmCEC4tI/j51T1Q/v+O7znYigeL07rnYhGA4Fhe0F7Gsbzx6BLki8ZCJIlo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705536064; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tndJafYULO15WVylyBbhF32eQv4wU0wthZrfJDnC8Qo=; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To: References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: X-Spam-Checker-Version:X-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Report:X-Spam-Status: Subject:X-SA-Exim-Version:X-SA-Exim-Scanned; b=pm9zMtEKk6P5JmDnZ1W8s/SFHu40MowcEl+F4w/vPKERLZlIRLUIMTg5X5fBFTMCTe4G/Z3/BmLDNalIl3w9691SVgFXeNiEq8Mrjdl0HZNMBymb/LOXyMLeFvKyH4MaRFjgawbSJ3ormV04lnIf1HtbzCL5MPBTGvwF6mWboXk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=xX3Ez3sn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Cc:To:From :Date:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vTG+SZV7VHmwDGhcCZdpEQ2H4RtxkfxH361qRtliDTI=; b=xX3Ez3sndcUmbasNUjPDQ4O3oq vS2G7rEd98SaJPwiFWzXUsBz8IJW0T/LOIkYmIaQ+lgpU1usMJdkbpKrBtQFIpeTWb00j/CmaximW UKDgZidaV9oCFhS6v1T4Ej8NNUfP5qRqjMDCCMgUfPWTaSJKpcwbkC52jN+J882om+fk=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168]:35334 helo=pettiford) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rQFq3-0001yz-8w; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:00:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:00:54 -0500 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, cosmin.tanislav@analog.com, shc_work@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Hugo Villeneuve Message-Id: <20240117190054.b6d24d64abefc1dc7147edda@hugovil.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240117223856.2303475-1-hugo@hugovil.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.80.174.168 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. * -1.7 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] serial: max310x: cleanups and improvements X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) Hi, On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 01:26:59 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:39 AM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > From: Hugo Villeneuve > > > > Hello, > > this patch series brings a few clean-ups and improvements to the max310x > > driver. > > > > Some of these changes are based on suggestions for the sc16is7xx driver by > > Andy Shevchenko following this dicussion: > > discussion Will fix in V2. > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75VebCZckUrNraYQj9k=Mrn2kbYs1Lx26f5-8rKJ3RXeh-w@mail.gmail.com/ > > Perhaps you may add Suggested-by to the related changes. Ok, will do for some of the patches in V2. > > The changes have been tested on a custom board using a max14830 in SPI > > mode, with an external oscillator (not crystal). Tests included a simple > > communication test with a GPS connected to UART0. > > > > They also have been tested by using i2c-stub to simulate the four ports on a > > virtual I2C max14830 device, but with obvious limitations as this cannot > > simulate all the hardware functions. > > ... > > LGTM, except this one (I have commented individually) > > serial: max310x: replace ENOTSUPP with preferred EOPNOTSUPP > > (checkpatch) > > So, for the rest > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Thank you for the review, Hugo Villeneuve