Received: by 2002:a05:7412:ba23:b0:fa:4c10:6cad with SMTP id jp35csp70076rdb; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:51:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGhHoMjQrvIa0bD6BH0CI3Rp6qyREhifB6mq91FXvFP/6UDC2QGoPscCPyXx9k4EiQOOwjO X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:ce6:b0:783:3eb7:73e7 with SMTP id c6-20020a05620a0ce600b007833eb773e7mr57765qkj.126.1705542677415; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:51:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1705542677; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bAmCORJnJBpdbZPNN6uwGgP9UvDBVwGQvlmutYtNS8vwwtnM1r/h7J1UELNap+f7Yp AcznkUEXnYzVnnHJlwUCYfa+MypOOcH1XtbyOWv62GR3n1Lm6UYqeqgrq8YRwLh7owBZ UGkEYZCE1pa7jDHzJXd9SLkpInQ5sGmgFFIFlBeVNOqiCiKKQA7a1M4UpNL1/zuiUYfK 4cI0ZecTw2nvM3HrFnVPdqL+pCC/64Duamttd/ZYK6s93RJUEx7nrojxxnoKkg7ncYYX DTESgT02Hd8EVu1oDvXqwrCy6DOzq/KM1yKjo384K3L2zjxcbB+xKWxAMgownFPLqrS2 pIxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=c5TR/hxPbEtg6hlAITIxXPHAVN+XmIxON3nOS8a6KfM=; fh=XbnLib5+QbjDz5E33etDLzF7ULriufQe04NwnER7uqM=; b=HtK6IRRFU+TrpicvHCO/TRlisDgMp5djfZ6gBgj4O1iPG2qPbhOEiO2qrux5XCCQE+ +rGcdzxvNUaO/KhLZ//AWZNe9j8iQtfYlM1Obiz1Jly3KVg9THlEuFLTu7+/G2gRBJtt SxpzQeUCnXPwcgvkfSATxzb961QAs8GNY3nfTjt79T92umxD+2STRMggE6e0gX3liZT/ j1NubbFJBbMg5TA1odfqe5LGNDJqB2yImwvl7Ns3X8m4x+02xhU30KKGzBHXXj0MTJCk WCNQRRK5lk62zmmciExQvPpX4GynU44CcZrv8z/y4KgDVcNcq/cTGD3dkSxthcsJtmFY aYcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.alibaba.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.alibaba.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29635-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-29635-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id de33-20020a05620a372100b0078321fc9bd9si13641403qkb.367.2024.01.17.17.51.17 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:51:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29635-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.alibaba.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.alibaba.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29635-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-29635-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFF11C21460 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 01:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67D253A8; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 01:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C73523D8; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 01:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.119 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705542631; cv=none; b=Rq9wl1LriHC2J17YtiHe839XJBNauTJTxL7eG6wXyS4FLQAHiA+7rG6fiYM0lgJlYalm+EDmdA6NufM27avF7DML+9xM29xAj4+Ckdc6EDD60s8KE7E+3c76qLJeO4USafzx6I/hyh4cypRrGHZOyi9bbcLCj/Ciklb7bysHQI8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705542631; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YdX5G24CXnDLogY+5UtvR6u9a94ZuekG0rXEedpL2tU=; h=X-Alimail-AntiSpam:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To; b=QqWxUw23/TaOWXstNUjSHQg48aMDJ31dlfnGGYMrx46POSLCJT+i8kDE7QpXipwvdANqBR1YQmfD8n3vbO7/nWAPi/N9wjrXFCaAYhlAy8udISAflPyQOJxIMe+XspkKsNJ8KRodoWcx31278C08oAw/KC+SxvFTT6cBJJP/iH4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.119 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R751e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046060;MF=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=14;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W-qr2Zh_1705542618; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:dust.li@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W-qr2Zh_1705542618) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:50:19 +0800 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:50:18 +0800 From: Dust Li To: Wen Gu , wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, yepeilin.cs@gmail.com, ubraun@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: fix illegal rmb_desc access in SMC-D connection dump Message-ID: <20240118015018.GB89692@linux.alibaba.com> Reply-To: dust.li@linux.alibaba.com References: <20240117122749.63785-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240117122749.63785-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:27:49PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote: >A crash was found when dumping SMC-D connections. It can be reproduced >by following steps: > >- run nginx/wrk test: > smc_run nginx > smc_run wrk -t 16 -c 1000 -d -H 'Connection: Close' > >- continuously dump SMC-D connections in parallel: > watch -n 1 'smcss -D' > > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 > CPU: 2 PID: 7204 Comm: smcss Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0+ #55 > RIP: 0010:__smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag] > Call Trace: > > ? __die+0x24/0x70 > ? page_fault_oops+0x66/0x150 > ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x140 > ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 > ? __smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag] > ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x35d/0x430 > ? __alloc_skb+0x77/0x170 > smc_diag_dump_proto+0xd0/0xf0 [smc_diag] > smc_diag_dump+0x26/0x60 [smc_diag] > netlink_dump+0x19f/0x320 > __netlink_dump_start+0x1dc/0x300 > smc_diag_handler_dump+0x6a/0x80 [smc_diag] > ? __pfx_smc_diag_dump+0x10/0x10 [smc_diag] > sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x121/0x140 > ? __pfx_sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 > netlink_rcv_skb+0x5a/0x110 > sock_diag_rcv+0x28/0x40 > netlink_unicast+0x22a/0x330 > netlink_sendmsg+0x1f8/0x420 > __sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xc0 > ____sys_sendmsg+0x24e/0x300 > ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80 > ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xd0 > ? __do_fault+0x34/0x160 > ? do_read_fault+0x5f/0x100 > ? do_fault+0xb0/0x110 > ? __handle_mm_fault+0x2b0/0x6c0 > __sys_sendmsg+0x4d/0x80 > do_syscall_64+0x69/0x180 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 > >It is possible that the connection is in process of being established >when we dump it. Assumed that the connection has been registered in a >link group by smc_conn_create() but the rmb_desc has not yet been >initialized by smc_buf_create(), thus causing the illegal access to >conn->rmb_desc. So fix it by checking before dump. > >Fixes: ce51f63e63c5 ("net/smc: Prevent kernel-infoleak in __smc_diag_dump()") ce51f63e63c5 ("net/smc: Prevent kernel-infoleak in __smc_diag_dump()") only add a memset() of 'struct smcd_diag_dmbinfo dinfo', which I don't think is not the real cause of the bug. >Signed-off-by: Wen Gu >--- > net/smc/smc_diag.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c >index 52f7c4f1e767..5a33908015f3 100644 >--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c >+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c >@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, > } > if (smc_conn_lgr_valid(&smc->conn) && smc->conn.lgr->is_smcd && > (req->diag_ext & (1 << (SMC_DIAG_DMBINFO - 1))) && >- !list_empty(&smc->conn.lgr->list)) { >+ !list_empty(&smc->conn.lgr->list) && smc->conn.rmb_desc) { > struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn; > struct smcd_diag_dmbinfo dinfo; > struct smcd_dev *smcd = conn->lgr->smcd; >-- >2.43.0