Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29691-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: biao.lu@intel.com
To: sameo@rivosinc.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] tsm: Runtime measurement registers ABI
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:35:15 +0800
Message-Id: <20240118033515.2293149-1-biao.lu@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240114223532.290550-1-sameo@rivosinc.com>
References: <20240114223532.290550-1-sameo@rivosinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Some confidential computing architectures (Intel TDX, ARM CCA, RISC-V
> CoVE) provide their guests with a set of measurements registers that can
> be extended at runtime, i.e. after the initial, host-initiated
> measurements of the TVM are finalized. Those runtime measurement
> registers (RTMR) are isolated from the host accessible ones but TSMs
> include them in their signed attestation reports.
>
> All architectures supporting RTMRs expose a similar interface to their
> TVMs: An extension command/call that takes a measurement value and an
> RTMR index to extend it with, and a readback command for reading an RTMR
> value back (taking an RTMR index as an argument as well). This patch series
> builds an architecture agnostic, configfs-based ABI for userspace to extend
> and read RTMR values back. It extends the current TSM ops structure and
> each confidential computing architecture can implement this extension to
> provide RTMR support.

Hi, Samuel
The ABI does not include eventlog, but eventlog is usually used with RTMR.
What do you think about how to implement eventlog?