Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-29749-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:01:58 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Cc: crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com, jirislaby@kernel.org, LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de,
	lukas@wunner.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tty: serial: Cleanup the bit shift with macro
Message-ID: <2024011836-glimmer-seventh-f2a7@gregkh>
References: <20231201071554.258607-2-crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com>
 <20240117145623.3556-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240117145623.3556-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:56:23PM +0100, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> > This patch replaces the bit shift code with "_BITUL()" macro inside
> > "serial_rs485" struct.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Crescent CY Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@moxa.com>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/serial.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > index 53bc1af67..6c75ebdd7 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
> >  #define _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
> >  
> > +#include <linux/const.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  
> >  #include <linux/tty_flags.h>
> > @@ -140,14 +141,14 @@ struct serial_icounter_struct {
> >   */
> >  struct serial_rs485 {
> >  	__u32	flags;
> > -#define SER_RS485_ENABLED		(1 << 0)
> > -#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND		(1 << 1)
> > -#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND	(1 << 2)
> 
> In the old definition (1 << 3) wasn't used.
> 
> > -#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX		(1 << 4)
> > -#define SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS		(1 << 5)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDRB			(1 << 6)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_RECV		(1 << 7)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_DEST		(1 << 8)
> > +#define SER_RS485_ENABLED		_BITUL(0)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND		_BITUL(1)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND	_BITUL(2)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX		_BITUL(3)
> 
> Isn't it a break if number 3 isn't skipped here as well?

Ugh, yes it is, good catch!

Care to send a patch to fix this up?

thanks,

greg k-h