Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756522AbXLNSxo (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:53:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756149AbXLNSxa (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:53:30 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43600 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756127AbXLNSx3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4762D005.5060800@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:48:37 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Rene Herman , Ingo Molnar , "David P. Reed" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on some AMD64x2 laptops, etc. References: <1184216528.12353.203.camel@chaos> <1184218962.12353.209.camel@chaos> <46964352.7040301@reed.com> <1184253339.12353.223.camel@chaos> <469697C6.50903@reed.com> <1184274754.12353.254.camel@chaos> <4761F193.7090400@reed.com> <476250D5.8000409@gmail.com> <20071214142355.GA10130@elte.hu> <476294D3.4060609@keyaccess.nl> <20071214144628.GA16074@elte.hu> <476299B7.8030908@keyaccess.nl> <20071214183626.4a16e2af@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20071214183626.4a16e2af@the-village.bc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1044 Lines: 23 Alan Cox wrote: >>> i dont think this should matter: old systems that truly _need_ the ISA >>> delay will be slow enough to not trip up. (nor are they really affected >>> by these early delays - the delays were more for crappy ISA devices that >>> get initialized later down, when the delay loop is already calibrated) >> 8253 (DMAC) and 8254 (PIT) have been reported in earlier versions of the >> thread. By Alan, I believe. > > They've been seen to be problems up to PII era machines. I'm not aware of > any newer than that with this problem. We also don't need to touch the > DMAC that early anyway that I can see - just the PIT. > > In fact if we have a fast processor we have a TSC and APIC so we don't > need the PIT ? Well, the TSC may be unstable and the APIC may be disabled. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/