Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-30537-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: dregan@broadcom.com
To: dregan@broadcom.com,
	dregan@mail.com,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org,
	computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	kdasu.kdev@gmail.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joel.peshkin@broadcom.com,
	tomer.yacoby@broadcom.com,
	dan.beygelman@broadcom.com,
	william.zhang@broadcom.com,
	anand.gore@broadcom.com,
	kursad.oney@broadcom.com,
	florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
	rafal@milecki.pl,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	andre.przywara@arm.com,
	baruch@tkos.co.il,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting ecc setting from strap
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:53:52 -0800
Message-Id: <20240118195356.133391-7-dregan@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240118195356.133391-1-dregan@broadcom.com>
References: <20240118195356.133391-1-dregan@broadcom.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>

BCMBCA broadband SoC based board design does not specify ecc setting in
dts but rather use the SoC NAND strap info to obtain the ecc strength
and spare area size setting. Add brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap dts propety for
this purpose and update driver to support this option.

The generic nand ecc settings still take precedence over this flag. For
example, if nand-ecc-strength is set in the dts, the driver ignores the
strap setting and falls back to original behavior. This makes sure that
the existing BCMBCA board dts still works the old way even the strap
flag is set in the BCMBCA chip dtsi.

Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: David Regan <dregan@broadcom.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Minor cosmetic fixes
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
index 73fdf7ce21aa..869ea64e9189 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
@@ -1038,6 +1038,19 @@ static inline int brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
 		return -1;
 }
 
+static int brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host)
+{
+	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
+	int shift = brcmnand_sector_1k_shift(ctrl);
+	u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
+						  BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
+
+	if (shift < 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	return (nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs) >> shift) & 0x1;
+}
+
 static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val)
 {
 	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
@@ -1055,6 +1068,38 @@ static void brcmnand_set_sector_size_1k(struct brcmnand_host *host, int val)
 	nand_writereg(ctrl, acc_control_offs, tmp);
 }
 
+static int brcmnand_get_spare_size(struct brcmnand_host *host)
+{
+	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
+	u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
+						  BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
+	u32 acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs);
+
+	return (acc & brcmnand_spare_area_mask(ctrl));
+}
+
+static int brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(struct brcmnand_host *host)
+{
+	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
+	u16 acc_control_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs,
+						  BRCMNAND_CS_ACC_CONTROL);
+	int sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host);
+	int spare_area_size, ecc_level, ecc_strength;
+	u32 acc;
+
+	spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host);
+	acc = nand_readreg(ctrl, acc_control_offs);
+	ecc_level = (acc & brcmnand_ecc_level_mask(ctrl)) >> ctrl->ecc_level_shift;
+	if (sector_size_1k)
+		ecc_strength = ecc_level * 2;
+	else if (spare_area_size == 16 && ecc_level == 15)
+		ecc_strength = 1; /* hamming */
+	else
+		ecc_strength = ecc_level;
+
+	return ecc_strength;
+}
+
 /***********************************************************************
  * CS_NAND_SELECT
  ***********************************************************************/
@@ -2622,19 +2667,43 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host)
 		nanddev_get_memorg(&chip->base);
 	struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
 	struct brcmnand_cfg *cfg = &host->hwcfg;
-	char msg[128];
+	struct device_node *np = nand_get_flash_node(chip);
 	u32 offs, tmp, oob_sector;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, sector_size_1k = 0;
+	bool use_strap = false;
+	char msg[128];
 
 	memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
+	use_strap = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap");
 
-	ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip),
-				   "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
+	/*
+	 * Set ECC size and strength based on hw configuration from strap
+	 * if device tree does not specify them and use strap property is set
+	 * If ecc strength is set in dts, don't use strap setting.
+	 */
+	if (chip->ecc.strength)
+		use_strap = 0;
+
+	if (use_strap) {
+		chip->ecc.strength = brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(host);
+		sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host);
+		if (chip->ecc.size == 0) {
+			if (sector_size_1k < 0)
+				chip->ecc.size = 512;
+			else
+				chip->ecc.size = 512 << sector_size_1k;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
 				   &oob_sector);
 	if (ret) {
-		/* Use detected size */
-		cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
-					(mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
+		if (use_strap)
+			cfg->spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host);
+		else
+			/* Use detected size */
+			cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
+						(mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
 	} else {
 		cfg->spare_area_size = oob_sector;
 	}
-- 
2.37.3