Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-30747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240118104310.892180084@linuxfoundation.org> <96dc2b0b-ad51-42f9-a305-744d9d97272e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <96dc2b0b-ad51-42f9-a305-744d9d97272e@gmail.com>
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:22:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvviOww1sOPxZDJR471TUhu+Brgv-k9YqKP_mb++Ek9GA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.74-rc1 review
To: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, 
	patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, 
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, 
	rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:40, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +Stefan,
>
> On 1/18/24 02:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.74 release.
> > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:42:49 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.74-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> ARM and ARM64 builds worked fine and passed tests, however BMIPS_GENERIC
> fails to build with:


Following MIPS builds failed on 6.6.y and 6.1.y
but passed 6.7.y and Linux-next and mainline builds.

mips:

  * build/clang-17-defconfig
  * build/clang-nightly-defconfig
  * build/gcc-12-allmodconfig
  * build/gcc-12-cavium_octeon_defconfig
  * build/gcc-12-defconfig
  * build/gcc-12-malta_defconfig
  * build/gcc-8-allmodconfig
  * build/gcc-8-cavium_octeon_defconfig
  * build/gcc-8-defconfig
  * build/gcc-8-malta_defconfig

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

>
> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c: In function 'start_secondary':
> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'rcutree_report_cpu_starting'; did you mean 'rcu_cpu_starting'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    rcutree_report_cpu_starting(cpu);
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    rcu_cpu_starting
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> host-make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/mips/kernel/smp.o]

same here,

>
> which is caused by 7c20a4cc189eff36d5aeb586008a540d8024fbff ("mips/smp:
> Call rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier").
>
> It looks like rcutree_report_cpu_starting() has been introduced
> 448e9f34d91d1a4799fdb06a93c2c24b34b6fd9d ("rcu: Standardize explicit
> CPU-hotplug calls") which is in v6.7.
>
> For MIPS, it would like an adequate fix would be to
> 's/rcutree_report_cpu_starting/rcu_cpu_starting/' for the 6.1 and 6.6
> branches.
>
> Stefan, do you agree?
> --
> Florian


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org