Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:49:38 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
       dm-devel@redhat.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/30] blk_end_request: changing ub (take 4)
Message-Id: <20071214114938.b87883af.zaitcev@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071214.120454.39153297.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
References: <20071211154803.58beb681.zaitcev@redhat.com>
	<20071212.153815.39152138.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
	<20071213135916.27ebe3f9.zaitcev@redhat.com>
	<20071214.120454.39153297.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 623
Lines: 16

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:04:54 -0500 (EST), Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:

> I have investigated all code paths which call ub_end_rq() in ub.c,
> and confirmed that ub_end_rq() is always called with the queue lock
> held.  (sc->lock is registered as a queue lock.)

Thanks for reminding me about blk_init_queue, I forgot. Sorry for the
confusion.

Greetings,
-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/