Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760315AbXLNVF2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:05:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754795AbXLNVFU (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:05:20 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:57804 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754329AbXLNVFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:05:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:05:32 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Rene Herman , Ingo Molnar , "David P. Reed" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on some AMD64x2 laptops, etc. Message-ID: <20071214210532.GA28793@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1184253339.12353.223.camel@chaos> <469697C6.50903@reed.com> <1184274754.12353.254.camel@chaos> <4761F193.7090400@reed.com> <476250D5.8000409@gmail.com> <20071214142355.GA10130@elte.hu> <476294D3.4060609@keyaccess.nl> <20071214144628.GA16074@elte.hu> <476299B7.8030908@keyaccess.nl> <20071214183626.4a16e2af@the-village.bc.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071214183626.4a16e2af@the-village.bc.nu> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1253 Lines: 27 On Fri 2007-12-14 18:36:26, Alan Cox wrote: > > > i dont think this should matter: old systems that truly _need_ the ISA > > > delay will be slow enough to not trip up. (nor are they really affected > > > by these early delays - the delays were more for crappy ISA devices that > > > get initialized later down, when the delay loop is already calibrated) > > > > 8253 (DMAC) and 8254 (PIT) have been reported in earlier versions of the > > thread. By Alan, I believe. > > They've been seen to be problems up to PII era machines. I'm not aware of > any newer than that with this problem. We also don't need to touch the > DMAC that early anyway that I can see - just the PIT. > > In fact if we have a fast processor we have a TSC and APIC so we don't > need the PIT ? It is still good to be able to disable APIC/TSC. Neither are particulary reliable time sources. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/