Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31109-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <ab907c56-5d91-482c-8308-fe06c22c7f55@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 06:42:57 -0500
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rts5208: Add more details to Kconfig help
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240118191703.89535-1-jklott.git@gmail.com>
 <ce1d6680-a7f5-4939-a47c-3079e7136c28@moroto.mountain>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jacob Lott <jklott.git@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ce1d6680-a7f5-4939-a47c-3079e7136c28@moroto.mountain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 1/19/24 1:34 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:17:04PM -0500, Jacob Lott wrote:
>> The current help text is short and triggers a
>> warning from checkpatch.pl. This patch adds more
>> details to the help text which should provide better
>> information for whether or not to enable the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Lott <jklott.git@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3: Fixed spacing and newline in text
> The commit message is still not line wrapped correctly at 72-75
> characters.  It should have been:
>
> The current help text is short and triggers a warning from checkpatch.pl.
> This patch adds more details to the help text which should provide better
> information for whether or not to enable the driver.
>
> Or:
>
> The current help text is short and triggers a warning from
> checkpatch.pl. This patch adds more details to the help text which
> should provide better information for whether or not to enable the
> driver.
>
>
>> v1 -> v2: Corrected line spacing based off feedback
>>
>>   drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig | 10 +++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> index b864023d3ccb..c4664a26ba3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ config RTS5208
>>   	tristate "Realtek PCI-E Card Reader RTS5208/5288 support"
>>   	depends on PCI && SCSI
>>   	help
>> -	  Say Y here to include driver code to support the Realtek
>> -	  PCI-E card reader rts5208/rts5288.
>> +	  Choose Y here to enable support for the Realtek PCI-E card reader
>> +	  RTS5208/5288. This driver facilitates communication between the Linux
>> +	  kernel and the Realtek PCI-E card reader.
>>   
>> -	  If this driver is compiled as a module, it will be named rts5208.
>> +	  If you opt to compile this driver as a module, it will be named rts5208.
>> +	  Selecting N will exclude this driver from the kernel build. Choose option
>> +	  Y if your system includes the Realtek PCI-E card reader rts5208/rts5288.
>> +	  When in doubt, it is generally safe to select N.
>
> In the original code there were three lines of help text.
>
> 1)         Say Y here to include driver code to support the Realtek
> 2)         PCI-E card reader rts5208/rts5288.
> 3)         If this driver is compiled as a module, it will be named rts5208.
>
> The minimum that checkpatch wants is 4 lines.
>
> However, I feel like nothing you're adding here is useful information.
> Some of it is just confusing like, "This driver facilitates
> communication between the Linux kernel and the Realtek PCI-E card
> reader."  That line feels like information, but when you think about it,
> it doesn't actually mean anything.  The second paragraph is just
> repeated information so it's kind of a waste of time.
>
> Don't just obey checkpatch for the sake of obeying, if we can't think
> of anything else useful to say then three lines is enough.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Thank you for your feedback. Based off what Dan has said I would agree 
that it is best to leave the information as is.


For the future when talking about line wrapping I've been going based 
off VSCode's row/col count, is this not correct? For reference when 
writing the commit I would use a new line before hitting 72 "col" on 
each row. I ask for the future so I can make better commits.