Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31218-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
	jiri@resnulli.us,
	davem@davemloft.net,
	milena.olech@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com,
	kuba@kernel.org,
	mschmidt@redhat.com,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jan Glaza <jan.glaza@intel.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v6 3/4] dpll: fix userspace availability of pins
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:43:03 +0100
Message-Id: <20240119134304.576956-4-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240119134304.576956-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
References: <20240119134304.576956-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

If parent pin was unregistered but child pin was not, the userspace
would see the "zombie" pins - the ones that were registered with
a parent pin (dpll_pin_on_pin_register(..)).
Technically those are not available - as there is no dpll device in the
system. Do not dump those pins and prevent userspace from any
interaction with them. Provide a unified function to determine if the
pin is available and use it before acting/responding for user requests.

Fixes: 9d71b54b65b1 ("dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Reviewed-by: Jan Glaza <jan.glaza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
---
v6:
- no changes, bump the series version

 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 30f5be020862..314bb3775465 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -553,6 +553,24 @@ __dpll_device_change_ntf(struct dpll_device *dpll)
 	return dpll_device_event_send(DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_CHANGE_NTF, dpll);
 }
 
+static bool dpll_pin_available(struct dpll_pin *pin)
+{
+	struct dpll_pin_ref *par_ref;
+	unsigned long i;
+
+	if (!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
+		return false;
+	xa_for_each(&pin->parent_refs, i, par_ref)
+		if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, par_ref->pin->id,
+				DPLL_REGISTERED))
+			return true;
+	xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, par_ref)
+		if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, par_ref->dpll->id,
+				DPLL_REGISTERED))
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * dpll_device_change_ntf - notify that the dpll device has been changed
  * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
@@ -579,7 +597,7 @@ dpll_pin_event_send(enum dpll_cmd event, struct dpll_pin *pin)
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 	void *hdr;
 
-	if (WARN_ON(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id, DPLL_REGISTERED)))
+	if (!dpll_pin_available(pin))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1130,6 +1148,10 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_id_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	}
 	pin = dpll_pin_find_from_nlattr(info);
 	if (!IS_ERR(pin)) {
+		if (!dpll_pin_available(pin)) {
+			nlmsg_free(msg);
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
 		ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
 		if (ret) {
 			nlmsg_free(msg);
@@ -1179,6 +1201,8 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	xa_for_each_marked_start(&dpll_pin_xa, i, pin, DPLL_REGISTERED,
 				 ctx->idx) {
+		if (!dpll_pin_available(pin))
+			continue;
 		hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 				  cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
 				  &dpll_nl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
@@ -1441,7 +1465,8 @@ int dpll_pin_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	}
 	info->user_ptr[0] = xa_load(&dpll_pin_xa,
 				    nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_ID]));
-	if (!info->user_ptr[0]) {
+	if (!info->user_ptr[0] ||
+	    !dpll_pin_available(info->user_ptr[0])) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, "pin not found");
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 		goto unlock_dev;
-- 
2.38.1