Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31319-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:44:09 -0600
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
To: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	quic_eberman@quicinc.com, quic_collinsd@quicinc.com, quic_lsrao@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight
 request
Message-ID: <6tnescmrw4j2wzhc2p2lih6624xgt7spoxj2ahus6wzfcmmear@cqdkohjquzr7>
References: <20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-v1-1-71ee4f8f72a4@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-v1-1-71ee4f8f72a4@quicinc.com>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:24:10PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
> addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
> and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
> checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
> addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.
> 
> Enhance the in-flight request check for VREG requests by ignoring the
> address offset. This ensures that only one request is allowed to be
> in-flight for a given VREG resource. This is needed to avoid scenarios
> where request commands are carried out by RPMh hardware out-of-order
> leading to LDO regulator over-current protection triggering.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>

Two minor things:

    1. Does this deserve a Fixes: tag?
    2. The Signed-off-by chain here confuses me, you sent the patch
       so your SOB should be last, but then that makes me believe Elliot
       was the author which I don't think is reflected here (no From:
       line). Please read [0] for a bit more details

[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1

> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index a021dc71807b..5371d7e3090a 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  /*
>   * Copyright (c) 2016-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>   */
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s " fmt, KBUILD_MODNAME
> @@ -91,6 +92,15 @@ enum {
>  #define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED		BIT(8)
>  #define CMD_STATUS_COMPL		BIT(16)
>  
> +#define ACCL_TYPE(addr)			((addr >> 16) & 0xF)
> +#define VREG_ADDR(addr)			(addr & ~0xF)
> +
> +enum {
> +	HW_ACCL_CLK = 0x3,
> +	HW_ACCL_VREG,
> +	HW_ACCL_BUS,
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
>   * together:
> @@ -557,7 +567,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
>  		for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
>  			addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
>  			for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
> -				if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
> +				/*
> +				 * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
> +				 * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
> +				 * for in-flight VREG requests.
> +				 */
> +				if (HW_ACCL_VREG == ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) &&
> +				    VREG_ADDR(addr) == VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr))
> +					return -EBUSY;
> +				else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
>  					return -EBUSY;
>  			}
>  		}
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 943b9f0ab2cfbaea148dd6ac279957eb08b96904
> change-id: 20240117-rpmh-rsc-fixes-6c43c7051828
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>
> 
>