Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31543-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 15:30:54 -0500
From: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	hirokazu.yamauchi.hk@hitachi.com, ddouwsma@redhat.com,
	loberman@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length
Message-ID: <Zarb_u7mZCBGrgSX@fedora>
References: <20231215193954.1785069-1-audra@redhat.com>
 <20240115170822.451231-1-audra@redhat.com>
 <ZabLkep0gOFEyjxH@slm.duckdns.org>
 <Zafm-hkCI4sbOr78@fedora>
 <ZagJrod33CPFaXGg@mtj.duckdns.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZagJrod33CPFaXGg@mtj.duckdns.org>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 07:09:02AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Audra Mitchell wrote:
> > Thank you for the response. May I humbly mention that I did find the following
> > while testing my patch:
> > 
> > [    0.120298] workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN (32 chars). Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien
> > 
> > In an effort to be thorough, would you like me to submit a patch shortening
> > this? Perhaps to "events_freezable_pwr_efficient"?
> > 
> > To be clear, I am not pushing the change, however, I do want to make sure that
> > the changes being submitted are not causing additional clutter. 
> 
> Oh yeah, please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks.

Hey Tejun,

Do you want this as a stand alone patch or do you want me to re-submit both
patches as a series?

Thanks