Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934157AbXLNXGp (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:06:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933124AbXLNXG3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:06:29 -0500 Received: from stargate.chelsio.com ([12.22.49.110]:4623 "EHLO stargate.chelsio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756172AbXLNXG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:06:27 -0500 Message-ID: <47630C3B.602@chelsio.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:05:31 -0800 From: Divy Le Ray User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Wise , wenxiong@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters References: <20071205181527.22106.73134.stgit@speedy5> <4759A6EA.1050106@garzik.org> <4759CD92.2070604@chelsio.com> <4759D6AF.5050205@garzik.org> <4759E200.3050607@chelsio.com> In-Reply-To: <4759E200.3050607@chelsio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2007 23:04:14.0468 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5595440:01C83EA5] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1957 Lines: 65 Divy Le Ray wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >> Divy Le Ray wrote: >> > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >> Divy Le Ray wrote: >> >>> From: Divy Le Ray >> >>> >> >>> Add parity initialization for T3C adapters. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray >> >>> --- >> >>> >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h | 1 >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c | 82 ++++++++++++ >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c | 15 ++ >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/regs.h | 248 >> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/sge.c | 24 +++- >> >>> drivers/net/cxgb3/t3_hw.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++--- >> >>> 6 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> dropped patches 2-3, did not apply >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Hi Jeff, >> > >> > I noticed that you applied the first one of this 3 patches series >> to the >> > #upstream-fixes branch. >> > These patches are intended to the #upstream (2.6.25) branch, as >> they are >> > built on top of the >> > last 10 patches committed - 9 from me, and the white space clean up >> > (thanks!). >> > May be this is the reason why they did not apply. >> >> Ah... you need to tell me these things. I looked for a kernel version >> in your messages but did not see one. >> > I had put it in the introduction mail, I should have added the kernel > version in the patch titles. > I'll do from now on. > >> >> Does the patch #1 need to be reverted for 2.6.24? >> > No, it can be applied to 2.6.24. > The 2 next patches seem to apply cleanly on #upstream when patch #1 is > popped out the patch stack. > Hi Jeff, Did you get a chance to apply these patches #upstream ? Cheers, Divy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/