Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31762-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: mpatocka@redhat.com,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	msnitzer@redhat.com,
	heinzm@redhat.com,
	song@kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai1@huaweicloud.com,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] md: don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:37:31 +0800
Message-Id: <20240120103734.4155446-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240120103734.4155446-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240120103734.4155446-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

If array is read-only and md_do_sync() is done. Currently
md_check_recovery() ignore this case, henc sync_thread can't be
unregistered.

Before this patch, use stop_sync_thread() directly for read-only
array will hang because md_check_recovery() can't clear
MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, which is possible for dm-raid.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 07b80278eaa5..6906d023f1d6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9445,6 +9445,20 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws)
 		sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action);
 }
 
+static void unregister_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
+{
+	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) {
+		/* resync/recovery still happening */
+		clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mddev->sync_thread))
+		return;
+
+	md_reap_sync_thread(mddev);
+}
+
 /*
  * This routine is regularly called by all per-raid-array threads to
  * deal with generic issues like resync and super-block update.
@@ -9482,7 +9496,8 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
 	}
 
 	if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) &&
-	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery))
+	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) &&
+	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery))
 		return;
 	if ( ! (
 		(mddev->sb_flags & ~ (1<<MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING)) ||
@@ -9504,8 +9519,7 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
 			struct md_rdev *rdev;
 
 			if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) {
-				/* sync_work already queued. */
-				clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
+				unregister_sync_thread(mddev);
 				goto unlock;
 			}
 
@@ -9568,16 +9582,7 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
 		 * still set.
 		 */
 		if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) {
-			if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) {
-				/* resync/recovery still happening */
-				clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
-				goto unlock;
-			}
-
-			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mddev->sync_thread))
-				goto unlock;
-
-			md_reap_sync_thread(mddev);
+			unregister_sync_thread(mddev);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 
-- 
2.39.2