Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-31781-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 11:41:20 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org,
	leon@kernel.org, haleyb.dev@gmail.com, ja@ssi.bg,
	judyhsiao@chromium.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] neighbour: complement nl_ntbl_parm_policy
Message-ID: <20240120114120.GB110624@kernel.org>
References: <20240119070847.5402-1-linma@zju.edu.cn>
 <20240119195058.GA105385@kernel.org>
 <3ddbc728.7c83.18d245c1152.Coremail.linma@zju.edu.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3ddbc728.7c83.18d245c1152.Coremail.linma@zju.edu.cn>

On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 08:53:50AM +0800, Lin Ma wrote:
> Hello Simon,

..

> My bad, I prepare this patch on the linux-stable tree and never thought this would happen.
> Will also compile on the right tree next time.
> 
> So should I send this to net which has this attribute or something?

Hi Lin Ma,

If it is a fix for net, then it should be based on net and targeted at net.

	Subject: [PATCH net] ...

Else, it should be based on and targeted at net-next.

Either way, I think reposting is a good idea.
Although in the net-next case, please note that it is closed,
so please wait for it to reopen before posting patches for it.
It is likely to reopen next week.

Does that help?