Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756747AbXLOC2j (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:28:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752611AbXLOC2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:28:30 -0500 Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116]:60947 "EHLO mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751724AbXLOC23 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:28:29 -0500 Message-ID: <47633BAE.6040604@lwfinger.net> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:27:58 -0800 From: Larry Finger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mvtodevnull@gmail.com CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Michael Buesch , Daniel Walker , Ray Lee , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Simon_Holm_Th=F8gerse?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?n?= , matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@bohmer.net, Ingo Molnar , kjwinchester@gmail.com, jonathan@jonmasters.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex References: <20071213003028.676998182@mvista.com> <1197637194.7549.10.camel@odie.local> <200712141404.24275.mb@bu3sch.de> <200712150151.49025.rjw@sisk.pl> <476326A1.6090404@lwfinger.net> <520b60a90712141759h65f1e63ei65ba00887a930d06@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <520b60a90712141759h65f1e63ei65ba00887a930d06@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 29 mvtodevnull@gmail.com wrote: > > Could this be the reason my BCM94311MCG rev 1 receives such terrible > performance with b43 but works well with bcm43xx? The device is > 802.11b/g but my router is 802.11b. I filed a report on this issue > here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413291 No. On my BCM4311/1, my transfer rate peaked at about 12 Mbs with bcm43xx, but increased to 20 Mbs with b43. These tests were done with iperf with a server running running on a second computer connected by wire to my router. These rates are for 802.11g. When my interface was locked at 11 Mbs, the transfer rate was the expected 5.3-5.5 Mbs with both drivers. > I was told by Michael that I would have to fix it myself, and I am > trying, but the learning curve is a little steep. If this is relevant, > I might at least have some direction to go in. I suspect that mac80211 is doing something that your router does not like. Do you have any chance to capture the traffic between your computer and the router by using a second wireless computer running kismet or wireshark? A look at the differences between b43 and bcm43xx should show the reason. Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/