Received: by 2002:a05:7412:7c14:b0:fa:6e18:a558 with SMTP id ii20csp185795rdb; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:18:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDwYS/8DNsxZUy6uKG2Uc/tpLTmAFXfo4MD54HG3SXXEGHdfa6QkAl1AJb3X0oSsraZFiY X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:550:b0:42a:163e:89bf with SMTP id m16-20020a05622a055000b0042a163e89bfmr4947468qtx.112.1705911498885; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:18:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b11-20020ac85bcb000000b0042a326a856asi4326739qtb.511.2024.01.22.00.18.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-32498-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=gVeE8TLa; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-32498-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-32498-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629EF1C21C7B for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C920DE9; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="gVeE8TLa" Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B4F210E2 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705911489; cv=none; b=V2kYq6IkWziHAIaQNdZZU2iMJQPXEdpIur/5cj/Osz5icwsqADRXOCWtJEzzcnbnZdZDJO2iYHbsanXP3qmVD8lLB1P2je4L2thTywU1A8E/daheeS7/poXwY0XAjUluCNyyyUoMv+lfqbK5N1UqXQYLHxd3bHAIeflY/9kZ2LA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705911489; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TuCnBVR88ntymG76CNyDH8bqX5RV/3GbHvDE2cVI+k0=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=guA7P4H+FXFN+HMnt5dhprQSV2nWWALvdM2QUQWbMFSqnq7cPhbLAPw7JPucvvA7Dw6Kcj1S3O3ssCr0FjmqmCjCDZzyzgkzh9QaesN7ctnJ1A39hpKIFnjJkIG7cQyn1OYUgcU9LQZXrdA8zXLrsvtQp4vYYqZ1iXGJN50Qcl4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=gVeE8TLa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50ff9bde634so545383e87.2 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:18:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1705911485; x=1706516285; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TuCnBVR88ntymG76CNyDH8bqX5RV/3GbHvDE2cVI+k0=; b=gVeE8TLaUNQRDxyF2WTF1vJiy3iqct0QQj0FFL9nit8OHr3tOiSvr5PafROA8m9P8W uxUIt65ddDIfefLPxFsix1DpSRt4SWRGlNy9o/ZeakcUEdYDAQFKuPD0RtbiNDaRVTDV arsS2i2a+VdL98kuW2+9FRLC5Q1RoRE1HU5W8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705911485; x=1706516285; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TuCnBVR88ntymG76CNyDH8bqX5RV/3GbHvDE2cVI+k0=; b=Gs/J263ooywXWsPCxTSe6D7f/chXEGT1D2EISF6761C6iGr8A+ppk3V4A8GgiezQMR qlh7DwyMs6DqfqT59HOMC7F18mHHx+3hi2vJvw94KIq2gmVIPRL40RgawCscnDqJM8Ja LbEX0w4t/ImsPyfy81SF++Gjr0RMlrR3ltFjW8aqM0tfa4GaA1bnS+WSfjRTYqkv1G0V JKdjC/6UZ9dOUtuaQXbxAfqgTr08MRmdNnJcVtCjKIBERpj7rcMqfd4S+wx4Q8QPScU5 XWLGvI/HD0ZWcx9Z3077WJd749GviSK/bErygvpXxFP2HYBLd/44L/ffDrpUXsvqN3+p fTHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYFuWJWmOnPOPTdzN7KZIYsV/H3yvl4Hc5/dFAZCDMqWDtmxoV DzPYf/cM1/ovawPQHD6L/W8uqcoNCZ0BpPBqNhiBYsp8Wi1xlznRXQSojugwMzEGG3/iUsJdsc8 PxcGBIqjOM6nuF1kll9Y7TEhVC5jE7Q326YVD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d1c:b0:50e:3f2e:c726 with SMTP id d28-20020a0565123d1c00b0050e3f2ec726mr1762337lfv.87.1705911485563; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:18:05 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231213150435.4134390-1-wenst@chromium.org> <20231213150435.4134390-2-wenst@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:17:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Sort entries by SoC then board compatibles To: Matthias Brugger Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eugen Hristev , Conor Dooley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:02=E2=80=AFPM Matthias Brugger wrote: > On 13/12/2023 16:04, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > Some of the new MediaTek board entries were inserted in a chronological > > order, or just randomly. This makes it harder to search for an entry. > > > > Sort the entries by first grouping by SoC, then sorting by board > > compatible strings. Also add a comment at the top asking people to do > > the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > > Does not apply cleanly, would you mind to rebase the whole series onto v6= 8-rc1. Sure. There's still a bit of discussion on patch 6. After that is resolved I'll send a v5 which will also address some review comments. ChenYu