Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761201AbXLOGey (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:34:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751636AbXLOGes (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:34:48 -0500 Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:2726 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbXLOGer (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:34:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:34:42 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE no-ops when CONFIG_BUG is off Message-ID: <20071215063442.GA26491@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20071214132755.GA18309@gondor.apana.org.au> <1197700290.6696.52.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1197700290.6696.52.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1003 Lines: 22 On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 05:31:30PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > That's something I've actually never quite liked... the fact that we > evaluate the expression anyway. I'm pretty happy with -not- evaluating > the expression when CONFIG_BUG is on most of the time since whatever is > in there is purely here for the sake of the BUG/WARN test. Whether we evaluate the expression is a completely different debate. I personally agree with you that expressions that have side-effects are a stupid idea for either WARN_ON or BUG_ON. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/