Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762447AbXLOHJs (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:09:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753071AbXLOHJi (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:09:38 -0500 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.233]:14473 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752469AbXLOHJh (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:09:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=M39iDsA8ox7WEzMfFnMDBIx2f5mZ5PbIEvaaH+gRpN9vcifPksB1OWqitYbcpCX60HDOdZukf9X/XuQE0HMpkWUicNNRlZVy9T3bRgPSvJbpl92P7obwcXfZu9tma5d9CsacrXAbtNXwa+njTSULh7YvwqryDVXkmhlJjNpexQQ= Message-ID: <2c0942db0712142309v15f79068m8c033180d41b9be@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:09:35 -0800 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Gabriel C" Subject: Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <47633ECC.3020804@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2c0942db0712131746s7da91f2bkf45b3e1ddf16d1f3@mail.gmail.com> <200712150305.02589.rjw@sisk.pl> <47633ECC.3020804@googlemail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9c185fe823e62ed1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1597 Lines: 35 On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote: > >> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just > >> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip > >> (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know. > >> I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to > >> have my main system down long enough for a test. Right now I'm kinda > >> up against a deadline, but didn't want to leave it unreported. Should > >> be easy for someone else to confirm or deny whether current tip has > >> the problem. > > > > FYI, I have created a bugzilla entry for this issue at: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9568 > > Hmm what do you mean by empty ? it does not capturing anything on that interface ? Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd when I did a make oldconfig, I suppose. (Or because I'm on an x86-64 kernel?) Regardless, -rc5 is currently building, and I'll try it in the morning. > I do run -rc5-git with wireshark-0.99.6 and tshark -i eth0 or lo works here. Excellent. Thank you for checking! Rafael: I'll update the bugzilla as warranted after testing. Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/