Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-33849-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240122143030.11904-1-quic_okukatla@quicinc.com> <20240122143030.11904-5-quic_okukatla@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240122143030.11904-5-quic_okukatla@quicinc.com>
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:43:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoU=jOSERW70NBXkr5JARH+2TAL1KSb130DTcSu4EmX4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add clocks for QOS configuration
To: Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@quicinc.com>
Cc: georgi.djakov@linaro.org, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@chromium.org, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 16:39, Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Add clock handles for required clocks to be enabled for
> configuring QoS on sc7280.
>
> Change-Id: I58991300ff1d8d2865763d4e79ee81c03586249e
> Signed-off-by: Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 83b5b76ba179..73acf1bd0f97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -2099,6 +2099,8 @@
>                         reg = <0 0x016e0000 0 0x1c080>;
>                         #interconnect-cells = <2>;
>                         qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> +                       clocks = <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +                               <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_USB3_PRIM_AXI_CLK>;
>                 };
>
>                 aggre2_noc: interconnect@1700000 {
> @@ -2106,6 +2108,7 @@
>                         compatible = "qcom,sc7280-aggre2-noc";
>                         #interconnect-cells = <2>;
>                         qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> +                       clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_IPA_CLK>;

Is there any reason to write QoS for the IPA before the IPA starts
poking around? The same question applies to aggre1 NoC.

>                 };
>
>                 mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry