Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-33905-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <88a6c45b-eaf5-a391-7758-d04f1d0611d2@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:06:32 +0000
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be
 scheduled on any-but cpu
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
 H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
 baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@google.com,
 dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com
References: <20231215174343.13872-1-james.morse@arm.com>
 <20231215174343.13872-22-james.morse@arm.com>
 <1516e4ad-b0c6-4c03-922a-5b14522c8d0a@intel.com>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1516e4ad-b0c6-4c03-922a-5b14522c8d0a@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Reinette,

On 16/12/2023 05:02, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 12/15/2023 9:43 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> When a CPU is taken offline resctrl may need to move the overflow or
>> limbo handlers to run on a different CPU.
>>
>> Once the offline callbacks have been split, cqm_setup_limbo_handler()
>> will be called while the CPU that is going offline is still present
>> in the cpu_mask.
>>
>> Pass the CPU to exclude to cqm_setup_limbo_handler() and
>> mbm_setup_overflow_handler(). These functions can use a variant of
>> cpumask_any_but() when selecting the CPU. -1 is used to indicate no CPUs
>> need excluding.

> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>


Thanks!

James