Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-32924-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:29:22 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: Remove usage of the deprecated
 ida_simple_xx() API
Message-ID: <20240122112922.GH2543524@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <7fce4c8c4345d283dbfadd3cea60fdc49f9ca087.1705007397.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7fce4c8c4345d283dbfadd3cea60fdc49f9ca087.1705007397.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:10:21PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
> ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().
> 
> Note that the upper limit of ida_simple_get() is exclusive, but the one of
> ida_alloc_range()/ida_alloc_max() is inclusive. So a -1 has been added
> when needed.

Looks tood to me but wanted to check if you tested this on a real
hardware or you just build tested?