Received: by 2002:a05:7412:5112:b0:fa:6e18:a558 with SMTP id fm18csp278507rdb; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:51:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwOY/q3itaRXqinL/LyITVCKuchoBZoutLuhruW3xjklAgNKC7L5YS/CO0t23U3S1i2Jxb X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa83:0:b0:dc2:56e9:7d04 with SMTP id t3-20020a25aa83000000b00dc256e97d04mr2634523ybi.61.1705989065521; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:51:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1705989065; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FCqlY9Ml4jW3jbGwDh9gYibfdHK4S8TNlt8N3OSXHcWO8otru63tPPzmLbzQdIIxvn CKOoja//QB5sPy5uREBrp7vc8cHK86IjHycNQ0y3PQPqWwNDIEjhXtLlm+f0AqPyLfU/ RpxmDAw0+UTvY5JwkXlL6lzOP4T94KFCrb0RAu8nn4fzaAyrxbZqFh/VVfk4Pe87wAaL EOSTsN1HRi4xtjvpq3HqbtDw8jCR8/aB8Wb4x2Dsf3flMyjdnyYZDJWEgaPwNDsF+cEv 4cq220eCxkKQZFc25MtU+/wjXF6G5SqItG3zQhoWHhzsjKWFjVs6cN5St6QATmsMA5ug HlEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=H+rMK0KBBnQyaHb54gBf8clNL10ejkmGqcBgOHn7Pt4=; fh=z4Vn0w8uEwtyMNDgPVKlAkoxT6Ib4ltRAckk3HsNN6c=; b=CxQ4W4K6DTiGxFnOPmgJ1Ru0HAC03JeO2TSMpD7nSHqIchVc1PPv4hEoJbCmKcaoKf VjmFfbbPFh1W5uKFMLX0zUjFyjR3RaNZKXBOBxvc1yZQo81nNGYdADlbbTuDFvF6nZ/k iU5HoOfhQO5Eyp8GwjkSLwQoJuInmAAgrCsWx80m1yrdZbZ9VAIomBBchhQfpHTD2rax 7bWvDON88VP2pkIAGGyuLCuvRTtEXZDrSqDRTCqLqtAcJ04CUPfmvgp/7yt9HdTTjN2Q Kr5SCvGitZSMMXdYsqgrUt1GksiqVjQTr0a4+CeR5vo1UfD/Ny4nZY0scCGbBPNm4a5F hTuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UmunmPdf; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-34744-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-34744-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5-20020a656385000000b005cdfc9ab80csi9169592pgv.396.2024.01.22.21.51.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-34744-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UmunmPdf; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-34744-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-34744-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F85E2847F2 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9497E469F; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UmunmPdf" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E24E10965 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705989056; cv=none; b=TU1M/YZ75ZEG44AjmuT50jRMAHI4KfsjFNHeVjUIGKw+El57VJYXi+mg+HABhQuMwd6ioRp2Vicho60bSTSy15wLAOSOFpSC/DvN6Iy47lyuJyMIPVT4/tSBgzGRvm7OtkxNTwGAR3qUKv/BidlM7xYZzi0+cpzhqKgxS7iDmjw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705989056; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uUGqYPWkqLqAuYLajkHeoiaksi8vyt5EtObg/cfEv0A=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=k/ZFF3117wQgfVPxs9Af4h0b4jZ8QmJVrTermEsdo3WgNJLM7uxfGhD/f9zEA5wX/YQPn0tHtJJL3LCEUnLHCytKJqSpgizjugdHpG8nDKL9xIBcC8H1T/kseyO4E5NI6JwsuBSpfPM7z6Gxunerm8TUIX7/LJz2mDDx1rwTKE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UmunmPdf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705989054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H+rMK0KBBnQyaHb54gBf8clNL10ejkmGqcBgOHn7Pt4=; b=UmunmPdfnT+GnT51x1QezQdsFNCsmbCpPelURaiH6XW5cVekYX+1AB8mjTttha783UyoiC B4Q0KeSB+jkLgPuOwCvfJOF5dwEhqlaHnuQE5HMXt141oi4pnIvHpoWoT3nPE7HiqyLOz1 0CYVphKPOL8WwvqllzYDysuBG/d2gmM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-375-JHn3VzyfMY6lUkIpG0Vk8Q-1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:50:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: JHn3VzyfMY6lUkIpG0Vk8Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9386885A588; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.8.107] (unknown [10.22.8.107]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71B9492BC6; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <8075b1d2-1260-4f1d-a757-dc991d95710c@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:50:40 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Support RCU_NOCB on isolated partitions Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= Cc: Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Frederic Weisbecker , Jonathan Corbet , "Paul E. McKenney" , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Davidlohr Bueso , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mrunal Patel , Ryan Phillips , Brent Rowsell , Peter Hunt , Cestmir Kalina , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Alex Gladkov , Marcelo Tosatti , Phil Auld , Paul Gortmaker , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Juri Lelli , Peter Zijlstra , Costa Shulyupin References: <20240117163511.88173-1-longman@redhat.com> From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 On 1/22/24 10:07, Michal Koutný wrote: > Hello Waiman. > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:35:03AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >> This patch series is based on the RFC patch from Frederic [1]. Instead >> of offering RCU_NOCB as a separate option, it is now lumped into a >> root-only cpuset.cpus.isolation_full flag that will enable all the >> additional CPU isolation capabilities available for isolated partitions >> if set. RCU_NOCB is just the first one to this party. Additional dynamic >> CPU isolation capabilities will be added in the future. > IIUC this is similar to what I suggested back in the day and you didn't > consider it [1]. Do I read this right that you've changed your mind? I didn't said that we were not going to do this at the time. It's just that more evaluation will need to be done before we are going to do this. I was also looking to see if there were use cases where such capabilities were needed. Now I am aware that such use cases do exist and we should start looking into it. > > (It's fine if you did, I'm only asking to follow the heading of cpuset > controller.) OK, the title of the cover-letter may be too specific. I will make it more general in the next version. Cheers, Longman