Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-35044-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:53:51 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/82] arm64: atomics: lse: Silence intentional wrapping
 addition
Message-ID: <Za-Mr7YFhS9iXiPW@FVFF77S0Q05N>
References: <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
 <20240123002814.1396804-11-keescook@chromium.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240123002814.1396804-11-keescook@chromium.org>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:26:46PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Annotate atomic_add_return() and atomic_sub_return() to avoid signed
> overflow instrumentation. They are expected to wrap around.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> index 87f568a94e55..30572458d702 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
> @@ -79,13 +79,13 @@ ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_SUB(        )
>  #undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_SUB
>  
>  #define ATOMIC_OP_ADD_SUB_RETURN(name)					\
> -static __always_inline int						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap int				\
>  __lse_atomic_add_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic_fetch_add##name(i, v) + i;			\
>  }									\

I'd strongly prefer using add_wrap() rather than annotating the function, i.e.
make this:

  static __always_inline int						\
  __lse_atomic_add_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
  {									\
  	return add_wrap(__lse_atomic_fetch_add##name(i, v), i);		\
  }									\

Likewise for the other instances below.

With that, this looks fine to me.

Mark.

>  									\
> -static __always_inline int						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap int				\
>  __lse_atomic_sub_return##name(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic_fetch_sub(i, v) - i;			\
> @@ -186,13 +186,13 @@ ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_SUB(        )
>  #undef ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP_SUB
>  
>  #define ATOMIC64_OP_ADD_SUB_RETURN(name)				\
> -static __always_inline long						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap long				\
>  __lse_atomic64_add_return##name(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic64_fetch_add##name(i, v) + i;		\
>  }									\
>  									\
> -static __always_inline long						\
> +static __always_inline __signed_wrap long				\
>  __lse_atomic64_sub_return##name(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)			\
>  {									\
>  	return __lse_atomic64_fetch_sub##name(i, v) - i;		\
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>