Received: by 2002:a05:7412:5112:b0:fa:6e18:a558 with SMTP id fm18csp385514rdb; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEQCZPy1tOABPpTiWv+yNBe1HM52dYlKOo0fgz6T344uFWxHWiQcTFyd7tTovYg5tUkMKS X-Received: by 2002:a92:cd43:0:b0:361:ac91:2e51 with SMTP id v3-20020a92cd43000000b00361ac912e51mr5556481ilq.13.1706006963566; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1706006963; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HKx6SQH84fjmETk+ZMG5Ds/PFY5p3SUyh5HlTt3baSTsLiCR9IkXxNF81SibXKhDkV y9ZMPWY4u61/z7fqEUCyMvw/zpFllwcU+/iTRMaVIzYQmlWyKG1h9qJO8ih8MhgE0zCr Z9n7v/iidOlcqoV/2p87bFYr63qsaPQHOgkcxk++ly+RBQsVzbuqFx6qxW5pIwBCJwCK MxqhFfjgmRF/1n+uYmbp+gc7o3RV6JP3ZITWibmCWG9asOZxHl2NiTbhPCj4lHneL2e+ Da7lWoQJanoYoppXeuNKT6tpiRrobF0ryNZ6KNwK3El2FEzUPL7AOcYrDdcEIT24ZP6S koVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=iER4mCfZQHjX5vldd+UfqoqhW1+fd9a/CugQqPAvg1o=; fh=9VMDQ/UKJLnwnZ6CmYFxGfN8CgZ3YAgaG42Qqnv7mwQ=; b=dktkHMyi6XPsJArBCsw8f5jskIOCo4+VsjFLgabKj9yXFWW9I7SaG1AiFlhhUGWAgY lOSZp/4H5Wai9ApKv/jckwjjpiAHXEgMc4kOThs/SRkRW6AUyLd8hfOttQu9GzZYJprJ OXrRAO9fmvaeICfk9sqHgHPzE1oBX6r3YYtEqylm0cyChGc2ZrBXUtzNVeaRpkHMJ+2v EqpHkk+skPXvzvApXrUlEx2pn2XV4XZnsUVAXmaetxROWsgCDy9As+oxq2aTS9qk5+hm zJ0dm/UClUuyRwil8UfAivoiq6eX1IK20fhavvWaErI22DxcEKb+WILehm5RWnOHGv6u GVWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=S2JVeR97; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-35127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-35127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i3-20020a639d03000000b005cd8b9dc455si9901583pgd.567.2024.01.23.02.49.23 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-35127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=S2JVeR97; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-35127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-35127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B78528266B for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5B85C90B; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="S2JVeR97" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC8A5D720 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706006919; cv=none; b=SvkJGe69UG7EMov0ntHKmDF8AmPCNzGIKmtNqSX65crRac6sqzNHSqpYJAcVs/9a67gJsizQXN2CJfgYv3gdz1DkTBkGVNrq5/jdUswNq+z+R5cvnIRumGjD1QlqcrcSuWFRl1Az3pqwyVHwXkSz9Xx8O3sNRR4yCLL2btQXfkY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706006919; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F6jHY4OHqd8suD//XVsc3Z8iQWKZmS6tiEwe/yedZag=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rl+xvIV8SMPpxjpHoyoEp/CoGYCkhNLmM1suchSsXVaht+S1lkozZ2/unL9fbEaVSic5ln5aKv5F+LBVBkuEj1q/IO6sk0Nd9lY3/+BzJ5RuNmi8QPwgeCiKopxq9TbEbuC/6xQz1O/Vm1UbPkEQPhaqu9uZ/8GsXQOxXnPRSCU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=S2JVeR97; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1706006917; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=iER4mCfZQHjX5vldd+UfqoqhW1+fd9a/CugQqPAvg1o=; b=S2JVeR97Fe8QWuA30jcxCcFcxPeIGBiG9oxLIJvo02NyDqHRrHlR9sw5k2IKB4x3fTEtGr dUdZCGDElHSxJGXQkn2l7aV+vuQ8oe4ik9iNwqc8cGFoUB64aRH47XSPbKHTRDM0UNS+IF 79ona7dlgl8deqDa6WjDfNF/Y2t89l0= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-27-WIH1aHAEMoO_z8rA8o9uNg-1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:48:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WIH1aHAEMoO_z8rA8o9uNg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e4478a3afso18252825e9.1 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:48:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706006914; x=1706611714; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iER4mCfZQHjX5vldd+UfqoqhW1+fd9a/CugQqPAvg1o=; b=fVt8EmBRv9k1laNS3jaonjIgcPuAz5Tei9+CPEQLBt9DVpMhbh3221xmxmE/XlWNQS dHEl7AQ2hm3JZ0vXI6io9IjcjEVP03ZdG1bOlXlDcrfSdSapW8NABZXttDfezOjBtacV 3mnJuf5VjF9Ir0zBd9tQuYzpiPk1RTj4amefcmyxXGGbXtkFLkbT6XuavLX5RKopkKcD hiiOIMdJpdE+5QCOVwok8a6oWhWC02KFPE/+7cXOgfPhknkwatA9DYSigIX0iRjASpro P+r5qpFLNqG4lsC+uIdvgp5YbJhDViQGtyeMUrm4HXcp6kcQfPJE5EU4GVpsPAqZVK0z Q9GQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxL96Z8oMX14RYHbjUsenovaVbNOTD1j/PKHesArNF7Aodl/KWc Jx8WP3Zp+mW7D4KckA/8DpDj5Nmid7A92pL2XEVIHiQbT0iSDLNgwsqTqnsJelg2pGHE4v4xbeR hJ1GjjwnFtS8vChybFbwDAiwYnC7TZZwUy7zw5jMDoLtUCiyXG8l5zALQCE6j1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4515:b0:40e:c047:9336 with SMTP id t21-20020a05600c451500b0040ec0479336mr183554wmo.100.1706006914185; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:48:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4515:b0:40e:c047:9336 with SMTP id t21-20020a05600c451500b0040ec0479336mr183533wmo.100.1706006913777; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c741:de00:bf0f:cd46:dc1c:2de9? (p200300cbc741de00bf0fcd46dc1c2de9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c741:de00:bf0f:cd46:dc1c:2de9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l6-20020a7bc346000000b0040d81ca11casm40988147wmj.28.2024.01.23.02.48.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:48:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46080ac1-7789-499b-b7f3-0231d7bd6de7@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:48:31 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/11] arm/pgtable: define PFN_PTE_SHIFT on arm and arm64 Content-Language: en-US To: Ryan Roberts , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dinh Nguyen , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "Naveen N. Rao" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexander Gordeev , Gerald Schaefer , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org References: <20240122194200.381241-1-david@redhat.com> <20240122194200.381241-2-david@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23.01.24 11:34, Ryan Roberts wrote: > On 22/01/2024 19:41, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's >> simpliy define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn(). >> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++ >> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h >> index d657b84b6bf70..be91e376df79e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h >> @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ static inline void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval) >> extern void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval); >> #endif >> >> +#define PFN_PTE_SHIFT PAGE_SHIFT >> + >> void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, >> pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval, unsigned int nr); >> #define set_ptes set_ptes >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> index 79ce70fbb751c..d4b3bd96e3304 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages) >> mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages); >> } >> >> +#define PFN_PTE_SHIFT PAGE_SHIFT > > I think this is buggy. And so is the arm64 implementation of set_ptes(). It > works fine for 48-bit output address, but for 52-bit OAs, the high bits are not > kept contigously, so if you happen to be setting a mapping for which the > physical memory block straddles bit 48, this won't work. Right, as soon as the PTE bits are not contiguous, this stops working, just like set_ptes() would, which I used as orientation. > > Today, only the 64K base page config can support 52 bits, and for this, > OA[51:48] are stored in PTE[15:12]. But 52 bits for 4K and 16K base pages is > coming (hopefully v6.9) and in this case OA[51:50] are stored in PTE[9:8]. > Fortunately we already have helpers in arm64 to abstract this. > > So I think arm64 will want to define its own pte_next_pfn(): > > #define pte_next_pfn pte_next_pfn > static inline pte_t pte_next_pfn(pte_t pte) > { > return pfn_pte(pte_pfn(pte) + 1, pte_pgprot(pte)); > } > > I'll do a separate patch to fix the already broken arm64 set_ptes() implementation. Make sense. > > I'm not sure if this type of problem might also apply to other arches? I saw similar handling in the PPC implementation of set_ptes, but was not able to convince me that it is actually required there. pte_pfn on ppc does: static inline unsigned long pte_pfn(pte_t pte) { return (pte_val(pte) & PTE_RPN_MASK) >> PTE_RPN_SHIFT; } But that means that the PFNs *are* contiguous. If high bits are used for something else, then we might produce a garbage PTE on overflow, but that shouldn't really matter I concluded for folio_pte_batch() purposes, we'd not detect "belongs to this folio batch" either way. Maybe it's likely cleaner to also have a custom pte_next_pfn() on ppc, I just hope that we don't lose any other arbitrary PTE bits by doing the pte_pgprot(). I guess pte_pfn() implementations should tell us if anything special needs to happen. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb