Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-36091-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dhruva Gole
 <d-gole@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: index: Minor re-arrangement and
 improvements
In-Reply-To: <20240104073317.19709-1-d-gole@ti.com>
References: <20240104073317.19709-1-d-gole@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:51:27 -0700
Message-ID: <87bk9bk9b4.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com> writes:

> * It seems odd that a develper is forced to look at the licensing rules
>   even before they get to the doc or coding guide.
>   This belongs under the "Working with the development community" / "All
>   development docs" page where it does reside even today.
> * Rearrange the section for Internal API manuals to go lower because
>   generally one would want to look at the tools and processes and admin
>   guide pages first and then move onto something deeper like the API
>   manuals.
> * Reword the Dev tools section and title to something a bit more suitable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>

As a general rule, multiple items in the changelog like this suggest
that you need to break a patch up.

In this case, though, I guess I don't see the reason why we would want
to churn this page this way.  The ordering of the items on the front
page was thought through and discussed the last time we did this; why
should we revisit it now?

Thanks,

jon