Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-36278-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-api@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org,
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@codeweavers.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] NT synchronization primitive driver
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:37:01 -0600
Message-ID: <12365105.O9o76ZdvQC@camazotz>
In-Reply-To: <2024012319-aptly-calculate-0f88@gregkh>
References:
 <20240124004028.16826-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
 <2024012319-aptly-calculate-0f88@gregkh>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 18:59:35 CST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:40:19PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> > =3D=3D Patches =3D=3D
> >=20
> > This is the first part of a 32-patch series. The series comprises 17 pa=
tches
> > which contain the actual implementation, 13 which provide self-tests, 1=
 to
> > update the MAINTAINERS file, and 1 to add API documentation.
>=20
> 32 patches?  I only see 9 here, why not submit them all?

Because Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst makes a point of askin=
g people not to submit large patch series (and it matches the expectation o=
f other projects I've worked with=E2=80=94that patches would be submitted a=
nd reviewed a few at a time). I suppose I've misunderstood that advice, tho=
ugh.

I'll resend with the entire series. Sorry for the noise.