Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-36699-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:20:09 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>, steve.kang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] block: introduce content activity based ioprio
Message-ID: <ZbDWSUkT/OjHTe0t@infradead.org>
References: <20240124085334.3060748-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240124085334.3060748-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 04:53:34PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
>  void __bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
>  		unsigned int len, unsigned int off)
>  {
> +	int class, level, hint, activity;
> +
> +	class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio);
> +	level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio);
> +	hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio);
> +	activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio);
> +
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_full(bio, len));
>  
>  	bvec_set_page(&bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt], page, len, off);
>  	bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>  	bio->bi_vcnt++;
> +	activity += bio_page_if_active(bio, page, IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY);
> +	bio->bi_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(class, level, hint, activity);

If you need to touch anything in the block layer I/O path
you're doign this wrong.  The file system that is submitting the
I/O needs to be in control of the priorities.
must not hack the assignment behind the