Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-36913-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240124085334.3060748-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
 <ZbDWSUkT/OjHTe0t@infradead.org> <CAGWkznHAi_U5erM0s8vFWwwucRKPoSzimNr9tdsPvs_sApGxgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZbDaq+iI/8ZQWRxF@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZbDaq+iI/8ZQWRxF@infradead.org>
From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:58:44 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGWkznGibmzH8WT9CjC9swWD3pLyCcWnG29eoj=EQk=Qd=kHBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] block: introduce content activity based ioprio
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, 
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	steve.kang@unisoc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:38=E2=80=AFPM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.or=
g> wrote:
>
> The I/O priority can be explicitly set by the submitter, task and
> blkcg arre jut fallbacks.
Yes. I would like to suggest if it is possible to have this commit
work as a hint for promoting the priority since it has been proved in
the verification?
>
> And as said multiple times now bio_add_page must just treat the page
> as a physical address container.  It must never look at MM-internal
> flags.
The alternative way is to iterate the request;s pages in the scheduler
which has been refused by Jens in the previous version. Anyway, we can
find a solution on this.
>