Received: by 2002:a05:7412:5112:b0:fa:6e18:a558 with SMTP id fm18csp1203692rdb; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:52:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFzUHMQLzZnY9QyqkeeEgEWIBVvCFg7voruyggoBRlGcey6buO9i13pY2tjNx/B1zHl8k7U X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:1712:b0:210:b225:da55 with SMTP id h18-20020a056870171200b00210b225da55mr3463722oae.88.1706111554716; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:52:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1706111554; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bFUTYFyq2/wgaZrfNOG7pbYMJ2OTJd6coLPptleUR4jJ2mWPtBpHRa7Tv+7k1ZEdfZ iQSCLwvEbp/CdtGb8B6TVqdyzQLAHeM+LNvauFgmkm6M/QFOJyeOl6AbWYx0r3oF78Xt nrinN7Gu+swZOmDkMLokPGFAOMpuyP2zi1QbmThbKlTFtHDohdiMycOh66usyeQmkH4u QN0P9OpBn/PhKS+JIkpWdIuAx+K305+zZbLSCKvD/twSvlX0hG680bdSJYCHsz9z6hkc NjbnJQyJxbSYUVa/SZRvxDrANG+ALxAstTNR8LjZC5CAlYTzrXcjeXOWlU8VTzuFBXI2 b3Sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=m+7Zp256i+hwRielQBkDmsG4QDxZpUDqRSOqAfnSrzk=; fh=OEYZmnbs2iyJdfFOY8wnP+MccCziXxbLhzb3Sq5P8HI=; b=o23H3ta+93M0M8ZEVSmuEvqvBiqmil7p3sRbqDlqVrDVkz5D8CtH08kCbfBtbuaGfD +xj0nCgXqdF2STzVzDkl2oT/7QdUzz5a44+07fHW9jfAI50UvMei9hmqwVXU0aCvGlod iHU+BYC8a+/hVmyMvF3EVQjuRDv42OYK1NMl3QGIow7W4ORUMyUN14jRCw4nZEilK4Dq mqhydKlEWoUEeER1xFiiv6RN1yhGzR1rmxL+5FcCmT0aI8/82q+0VUFzs34D1PANF2ix 8pF9zEmgepZHkc/a7fAZbQkmjW1tve+hA9YFEMNGQPJMLPsNC6QY/bVDuihNC7QBo/JD u81Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-37288-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-37288-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13-20020a63e94d000000b005cee9115685si11805127pgj.496.2024.01.24.07.52.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-37288-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-37288-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-37288-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C042285ACA for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88D477F3E; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4640C1B; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706111473; cv=none; b=WnD5oJp8BcGBY38ubjSTLty49EdS10bhcBBcsZy6tU1nUxSKxfb4an29lIE1M1vWHF5yNFia0Q45QfA3PbVCRjfYVs70vP93094izruBCV4eY9Jg2YQNSMvGmLauxi6owaquypRwdpK1SzVpAMYyUbuXYOvKpoFtvLZZ3UrI8Dg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706111473; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IDco1jSbZDkfu0yOrE7OiSthlGxb7LFfyQTuQ5j9LLA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F0JY9UddYUOdgKtfytpX42NFTLaWZsRMXKSHdm01hQGzP+Pn916Fw0JWWbLsxOc7ZosRfXM+u+lw+2Dy1mnazvfzvEsSyhLxO8gFScB4JF/8wxmr7KhLAEHsHgvgeC/nQjvLKt4IF+oorYSGyiuNuHsC7o/KlTFLOjstFnR3ev0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B31FB; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com (FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.30.162]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6547C3F762; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:51:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:05 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Ian Rogers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hector Martin , Marc Zyngier , acme@redhat.com, james.clark@arm.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com, leo.yan@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mike.leach@linaro.org, namhyung@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf print-events: make is_event_supported() more robust Message-ID: References: <20240116170348.463479-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:29:54AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:27 AM Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:04 AM Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > > Currently the perf tool doesn't deteect support for extneded event types > > > > nit: s/deteect/detect/ > > nit: s/extneded/extended/ > > > > > on Apple M1/M2 systems, and will not auto-expand plain PERF_EVENT_TYPE > > > hardware events into per-PMU events. This is due to the detection of > > > extended event types not handling mandatory filters required by the > > > M1/M2 PMU driver. > > > > > > PMU drivers and the core perf_events code can require that > > > perf_event_attr::exclude_* filters are configured in a specific way and > > > may reject certain configurations of filters, for example: > > > > > > (a) Many PMUs lack support for any event filtering, and require all > > > perf_event_attr::exclude_* bits to be clear. This includes Alpha's > > > CPU PMU, and ARM CPU PMUs prior to the introduction of PMUv2 in > > > ARMv7, > > > > > > (b) When /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid >= 2, the perf core > > > requires that perf_event_attr::exclude_kernel is set. > > > > > > (c) The Apple M1/M2 PMU requires that perf_event_attr::exclude_guest is > > > set as the hardware PMU does not count while a guest is running (but > > > might be extended in future to do so). > > > > > > In is_event_supported(), we try to account for cases (a) and (b), first > > > attempting to open an event without any filters, and if this fails, > > > retrying with perf_event_attr::exclude_kernel set. We do not account for > > > case (c), or any other filters that drivers could theoretically require > > > to be set. > > > > > > Thus is_event_supported() will fail to detect support for any events > > > targetting an Apple M1/M2 PMU, even where events would be supported with > > > > nit: s/targetting/targeting/ > > > > > perf_event_attr:::exclude_guest set. > > > > > > Since commit: > > > > > > 82fe2e45cdb00de4 ("perf pmus: Check if we can encode the PMU number in perf_event_attr.type") > > > > > > ... we use is_event_supported() to detect support for extended types, > > > with the PMU ID encoded into the perf_event_attr::type. As above, on an > > > Apple M1/M2 system this will always fail to detect that the event is > > > supported, and consequently we fail to detect support for extended types > > > even when these are supported, as they have been since commit: > > > > > > 5c816728651ae425 ("arm_pmu: Add PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE capability") > > > > > > Due to this, the perf tool will not automatically expand plain > > > PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events into per-PMU events, even when all the > > > necessary kernel support is present. > > > > > > This patch updates is_event_supported() to additionally try opening > > > events with perf_event_attr::exclude_guest set, allowing support for > > > events to be detected on Apple M1/M2 systems. I beleive that this is > > > > nit: s/beleive/believe/ > > > > > sufficient for all contemporary CPU PMU drivers, though in future it may > > > be necessary to check for other combinations of filter bits. > > > > > > I've deliberately changed the check to not expect a specific error code > > > for missing filters, as today ;the kernel may return a number of > > > different error codes for missing filters (e.g. -EACCESS, -EINVAL, or > > > -EOPNOTSUPP) depending on why and where the filter configuration is > > > rejected, and retrying for any error is more robust. > > > > > > Note that this does not remove the need for commit: > > > > > > a24d9d9dc096fc0d ("perf parse-events: Make legacy events lower priority than sysfs/JSON") > > > > > > ... which is still necessary so that named-pmu/event/ events work on > > > kernels without extended type support, even if the event name happens to > > > be the same as a PERF_EVENT_TYPE_HARDWARE event (e.g. as is the case for > > > the M1/M2 PMU's 'cycles' and 'instructions' events). > > > > > > Fixes: 82fe2e45cdb00de4 ("perf pmus: Check if we can encode the PMU number in perf_event_attr.type") > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland > > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > Cc: Hector Martin > > > Cc: Ian Rogers > > > Cc: James Clark > > > Cc: John Garry > > > Cc: Leo Yan > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier > > > Cc: Mike Leach > > > Cc: Namhyung Kim > > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose > > > Cc: Thomas Richter > > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Also: > Tested-by: Ian Rogers > > No regressions on Alderlake except a pre-existing problem I noted here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fWVQ-7ijjK3-w1q+k2WYVNHbAcejb-xY0ptbjRw476VKA@mail.gmail.com/ Cheers; I've folded that tag in along with the typo fixes. I'll send a v2 tomorrow assuming there's nothing else that crops up. Mark.