Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934349AbXLQQIk (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:08:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932946AbXLQQHr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:07:47 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:42564 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932447AbXLQQHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:07:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:06:59 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Harvey Harrison , LKML , Prasanna S Panchamukhi , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Masami Hiramatsu , Rusty Lynch , Masami Hiramatsu , Keshavamurthy Anil S Subject: Re: Final kprobes rollup patches Message-ID: <20071217160659.GC30958@elte.hu> References: <1197708350.898.87.camel@brick> <20071215085015.GA9720@elte.hu> <1197709442.898.97.camel@brick> <20071215131204.GE9720@elte.hu> <4766841B.1040500@redhat.com> <20071217143050.GA13290@elte.hu> <476695D9.8090904@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476695D9.8090904@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1146 Lines: 28 * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > cool! Please Cc: lkml and Harvey as well so that there's less > > overlap in unification work - Harvey spent quite some time unifying > > and cleaning up the kprobes code during the past week. > > Should I rewrite it based on current git tree? > My patch includes 3 part of patches. > - 2 Bugfix patches (which is not merged yet.) > - 2 booster patches (ditto) > - 2 unification patches (most of this patches are already done by Harvey's patch) would it be easier/more robust to first did the unification patches and then get the bugfixes and new features in? That would give us your bugfixes and new features on both 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time. feel free to do whichever approach you prefer - but it would be nice to preserve the unification and cleanup work done by Harvey. btw., is any of your bugfixes 2.6.24 material? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/