Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38567-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:11:14 +0100
Message-Id: <20240125-topic-thermal-v1-0-3c9d4dced138@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, 
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, 
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
This series simplifies it.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
Konrad Dybcio (2):
      dt-bindings: thermal-zones: Don't require polling-delay(-passive)
      thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-zones.yaml |  2 --
 drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c                                 | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 01af33cc9894b4489fb68fa35c40e9fe85df63dc
change-id: 20240125-topic-thermal-f954cf83fc50

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>