Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38699-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:04:38 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
CC: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        <kristo@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        <bb@ti.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and
 wakeup R5FSS nodes
Message-ID: <20240125140438.lmjrjzxqoy5lgsir@corset>
References: <20240121134017.374992-1-vaishnav.a@ti.com>
 <0fcec921-0220-4251-afa4-44db5e80d2ef@ti.com>
 <20240124172151.ngxaq6k5tnvsx4jr@proud>
 <2291204f-97d5-4887-b68f-8789fe85f838@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2291204f-97d5-4887-b68f-8789fe85f838@ti.com>

On 11:17-20240125, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
> 
> On 24/01/24 22:51, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 11:26-20240124, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
> > > Hello Vaishnav,
> > > 
> > > On 21/01/24 19:10, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> > > > K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
> > > > mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
> > > > Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
> > > > disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
> > > > below during AM62P SK boot:
> > > > 
> > > > r5fss@79000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@79000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@78000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > > > r5fss@78000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: b5080c7c1f7e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add nodes for more IPs")
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi    | 2 ++
> > > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi | 1 +
> > > >    2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > index c4b0b91d70cf..14eb9ba836d3 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > > > @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@79000000 {
> > > >    		ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
> > > >    			 <0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
> > > >    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > > > +		status = "disabled";
> > > > +
> > > >    		mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@79000000 {
> > > >    			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
> > > >    			reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > index 19f42b39394e..10a7059b2d9b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > > > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ wkup_r5fss0: r5fss@78000000 {
> > > >    		ranges = <0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x8000>,
> > > >    			 <0x78100000 0x00 0x78100000 0x8000>;
> > > >    		power-domains = <&k3_pds 119 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > > > +		status = "disabled";
> > 
> > Is there a reason for difference in white space addition?
> > 
> 
> For mcu_r5fss0_core0 child node there was no blank line as per the
> recommended coding style : https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst#n124
> 
> So I added a newline there and wkup_r5fss0 already had it correct, since the
> change was trivial it was not mentioned in commit message.
> 

For some reason i was misled to think that the EoL spacing was messed
up. Looking at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240121134017.374992-1-vaishnav.a@ti.com/ i
realise it is being fixed properly in the patch. Oops.. my bad.


Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D