Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759065AbXLQTR1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:17:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754290AbXLQTRS (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:17:18 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.185]:44953 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753763AbXLQTRS (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:17:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=JWTNfRmzeT5n1b8Vn988Bub4FcMA2VPVpzr1bX1rMIrBLXr3xsfdypSES4eSz4Os3EbrUdgvBUJ3GyeChvd33PdKJ0iN8UvPZwtezIUmGKILPzsxVZ3YAzRJ9TGzjS2X81zftjkcppgP/WesM9QHOMxc3ZWdm0GtrZN2CdfsORI= Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 0/6] (yet another) kprobes x86 code unification and boosters From: Harvey Harrison To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , Roland McGrath , Arjan van de Ven , prasanna@in.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, systemtap-ml , LKML In-Reply-To: <20071217163342.GA10495@elte.hu> References: <47669E87.1010506@redhat.com> <20071217163342.GA10495@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:17:22 -0800 Message-Id: <1197919042.23402.1.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1138 Lines: 32 On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:33 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I developed a series of patches which unifies kprobes code on x86 and > > introduces boosters on x86-64. These patches can be applied to > > 2.6.24-rc4-mm1. > > > > The purpose of this patchset is unifying kprobes_[32|64].[c|h] to > > kprobes.[c|h] for simplifying code maintenance. > > > > I know these patches are conflicting with Harvey's patch. We need to > > solve that. > > your series fixes the 64-bit crash that i was seeing, so i've picked it > up. Please work it out with Harvey which cleanups of him are not > included yet. > I thought the jprobe_saved_sp looked fishy on X86_64 in my unified set but I went bug-for-bug compatible I guess :-) If you look at my cleaned up set this was one of the main source of remaining ifdefs. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/