Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38838-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:36:10 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, abeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, dsahern@kernel.org,
	weiwan@google.com,
	"open list:IEEE 802.15.4 SUBSYSTEM" <linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/22] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for
 ieee802154
Message-ID: <ZbJ/6saj5Rn20x1N@gmail.com>
References: <20240122184543.2501493-1-leitao@debian.org>
 <20240122184543.2501493-3-leitao@debian.org>
 <20240124175158.7c8b9490@xps-13>
 <ZbIxYnEbFXi6NBMU@gmail.com>
 <20240125155532.285a2bbd@xps-13>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20240125155532.285a2bbd@xps-13>

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:55:32PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Breno,
> 
> leitao@debian.org wrote on Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:01:06 -0800:
> 
> > Hello Miqu?l,
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 05:51:58PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Hi Breno,
> > > 
> > > leitao@debian.org wrote on Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:45:23 -0800:
> > >   
> > > > W=1 builds now warn if module is built without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION().
> > > > Add descriptions to ieee802154 modules.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>  
> > > 
> > > I just see the v2 now. Please use "v2" in your commit title using -v or
> > > git-format-patch.  
> > 
> > Sorry, I am not sure I followed what you meant.  I've sent the v2, which
> > contains the 'v2' _tag_:
> 
> I believe *this* is a v2 because you fixed your initial patch,
> following Stefan's suggestion.
> 
> Anyway, it's fine for me to merge this patch through net directly (I
> don't know if net maintainers want W=1 fixes to go through net or
> net-next) so:

Thanks Miqu?l. Jakub convinced Paolo that these fixes should go through
net, that is why I am targeting `net`.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122105708.52d33fa0@kernel.org/