Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-39000-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:05:56 -1000
Message-ID: <20240125170628.2017784-4-tj@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240125170628.2017784-1-tj@kernel.org>
References: <20240125170628.2017784-1-tj@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

To prepare for unbound nr_active handling improvements, move work activation
part of pwq_activate_inactive_work() into __pwq_activate_work() and add
pwq_activate_work() which tests WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE and updates nr_active.

pwq_activate_first_inactive() and try_to_grab_pending() are updated to use
pwq_activate_work(). The latter conversion is functionally identical. For
the former, this conversion adds an unnecessary WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE
testing. This is temporary and will be removed by the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9e75535c4aeb..3a4c269204f3 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1461,16 +1461,36 @@ static bool pwq_is_empty(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	return !pwq->nr_active && list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works);
 }
 
-static void pwq_activate_inactive_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void __pwq_activate_work(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+				struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
-
 	trace_workqueue_activate_work(work);
 	if (list_empty(&pwq->pool->worklist))
 		pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
 	move_linked_works(work, &pwq->pool->worklist, NULL);
 	__clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE_BIT, work_data_bits(work));
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwq_activate_work - Activate a work item if inactive
+ * @pwq: pool_workqueue @work belongs to
+ * @work: work item to activate
+ *
+ * Returns %true if activated. %false if already active.
+ */
+static bool pwq_activate_work(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+			      struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
+
+	if (!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE))
+		return false;
+
 	pwq->nr_active++;
+	__pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void pwq_activate_first_inactive(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
@@ -1478,7 +1498,7 @@ static void pwq_activate_first_inactive(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	struct work_struct *work = list_first_entry(&pwq->inactive_works,
 						    struct work_struct, entry);
 
-	pwq_activate_inactive_work(work);
+	pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1616,8 +1636,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
 		 * management later on and cause stall.  Make sure the work
 		 * item is activated before grabbing.
 		 */
-		if (*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE)
-			pwq_activate_inactive_work(work);
+		pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
 
 		list_del_init(&work->entry);
 		pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
-- 
2.43.0