Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-39446-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:04:01 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
	sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, weiwan@google.com,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrew Waterman <waterman@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for
 epoll_params
Message-ID: <20240126000400.GA1987@fastly.com>
References: <20240125225704.12781-1-jdamato@fastly.com>
 <20240125225704.12781-4-jdamato@fastly.com>
 <2024012559-appraiser-coerce-b32f@gregkh>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2024012559-appraiser-coerce-b32f@gregkh>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:20:37PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:56:59PM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
> > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> >   *  Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> >   */
> >  
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > +
> 
> Why this addition?  You do not add any pr_*() calls in this patch at all
> that I can see.

Thanks, I've removed this for the next version. It was a remnant from a
previous version.