Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-39481-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] wq: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on unbounded queue_delayed_work
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:03:20 -0300
Message-ID: <20240126010321.2550286-1-leobras@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

When __queue_delayed_work() is called with WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, it means any
cpu is able to run the work, as well as any cpu timer is able to be used.

This is not good if a system does use CPU isolation, because it can take
away some valuable cpu time to:
1 - deal with the timer interrupt,
2 - schedule-out the desired task,
3 - queue work on a random workqueue, and
4 - schedule the desired task back to the cpu.

So to fix this, during __queue_delayed_work(), if both:
- Work is not cpu-bounded,
- CPU isolation is in place,
then pick a random non-isolated cpu to use both the timer and the
system per-cpu workqueue.

AS an optimization, if the current cpu is not isolated, use it's timer
instead of looking for another candidate.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
---
Changes since RFC:
- Do not use the same cpu from the timer for queueing the work.
- If the current cpu is not isolated, use it's timer instead of
  looking for another candidate.

 kernel/workqueue.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 76e60faed8923..0a85b00bbe52d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1958,10 +1958,24 @@ static void __queue_delayed_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	dwork->cpu = cpu;
 	timer->expires = jiffies + delay;
 
-	if (unlikely(cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
-		add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
-	else
-		add_timer(timer);
+	if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)) {
+		if (!housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_TIMER)) {
+			/* Reuse the same timer */
+			add_timer(timer);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * If the work is cpu-unbound, and cpu isolation is in place,
+		 * only use timers from housekeeping cpus.
+		 * If the current cpu is a housekeeping cpu, use it instead.
+		 */
+		cpu = smp_processor_id();
+		if (!housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TIMER))
+			cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu(HK_TYPE_TIMER);
+	}
+
+	add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.43.0