Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-39526-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:04:24 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
 palmer@dabbelt.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
 agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com,
 dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
 x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King
 <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/arm/mm: fix major fault accounting when
 retrying under per-VMA lock
Message-Id: <20240125180424.121455beae4d56799a0bac28@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240123064305.2829244-1-surenb@google.com>
References: <20240123064305.2829244-1-surenb@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:43:05 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:

> The change [1] missed ARM architecture when fixing major fault accounting
> for page fault retry under per-VMA lock. Add missing code to fix ARM
> architecture fault accounting.
> 
> [1] 46e714c729c8 ("arch/mm/fault: fix major fault accounting when retrying under per-VMA lock")
> 
> Fixes: 12214eba1992 ("mm: handle read faults under the VMA lock")

What are the userspace-visible runtime effects of this change?

Is a cc:stable backport desirable?

> Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>