Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-40698-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1705946889.git.dsterba@suse.com> <CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240126200008.GT31555@twin.jikos.cz> <8b2c6d1f-2e14-43a0-b48a-512a3d4a811d@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <8b2c6d1f-2e14-43a0-b48a-512a3d4a811d@suse.com>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:51:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjhtqo_FEqZkPuOVUNZzsGhjftdcN9aQpA3f3WD0qS1pA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 6.8-rc2
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 13:39, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, I forgot the most obvious problem.
>
> This means the extent buffer is full of garbage.

Allocation lifetime problems?

> What's the page size of the system? 4K or 16K or 64K?

This is a bog-standard x86-64 system. With 32 cores (and 64 threads),
but there's nothing remotely odd about it, except for the fact that
it's running a very recent kernel...

             Linus