Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S287236AbRL2XbI>; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:31:08 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S287245AbRL2XbB>; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:31:01 -0500
Received: from pop.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:62099 "HELO mail.gmx.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S287236AbRL2Xas>;
	Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:30:48 -0500
Message-ID: <3C2E51E9.A9B279D8@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 00:29:45 +0100
From: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
Reply-To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
CC: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Timothy Covell <timothy.covell@ashavan.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Linux Bug Tracking & Feature Tracking DB
In-Reply-To: <200112290657.fBT6vMSr008000@svr3.applink.net> <20011229105525.C19306@work.bitmover.com> <3C2E14AB.69CEA694@gmx.de> <E16KRjh-0000GP-00@starship.berlin> <3C2E4934.D582AB91@gmx.de> <20011229150247.A21733@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:52:36PM +0100, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > >
> > > On December 29, 2001 08:08 pm, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > > > Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The data in it is the current BitKeeper bug list (feel free to fix
> > > > > some :-)
> > > >
> > > > Bah!  Debugging and patching binaries isn't fun!
> > >
> > > Check the site, he provides the source.
> >
> > Just checked it again: no sources.  Only binaries.  None of them
> > will run on my system.  Last time I asked for the sources my
> > request was rejected.
> 
> The only interaction with you that I've ever had, according to my outbox,
> is on Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:38:43 -0800 where you asked about BK,
> said there wasn't an image for you platform, I asked what platform, and
> so far haven't heard back, at least I have no record of it.

The answer was sent 1 minute after your reply.  Here it is again:

----------------
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:36:40 +0100
> From: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
> To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
> Subject: Re: Source of Bitkeeper
> Message-ID: <39FE0608.7C11302E@gmx.de>
> References: <39FE034C.F6658D5A@gmx.de> <20001030153843.C31369@work.bitmover.com>
>
> Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 12:25:00AM +0100, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > > is the source code of Bitkeeper somewhere to download?
> > > There's no binary image for my system.  And, I prefer
> > > sources anyway.
> >
> > Which platform is it?
>
> An old linux system with libc5.
>
> Ciao, ET.
------------------

After that I heard nothing more from you.  I got the impression that a
libc5 system was not commercially interesting enough...

> And, it would be nice if you raised the issue with us rather than the
> kernel list, they aren't going to build your BK image for you.

I asked nobody to build a BK image for me.  You are constantly misusing
the lkml as a BK promotion facility.  And when you raise the impression
that sources are available I'll correct that.  Pretty simple.

Ciao, ET.


Reply-To set...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/