Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:39:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:39:14 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:47528 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:38:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:38:40 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Dave Jones Cc: Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Benjamin LaHaise , Oliver Xymoron , Christer Weinigel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking Message-ID: <20011229153840.C21760@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Benjamin LaHaise , Oliver Xymoron , Christer Weinigel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011229151440.A21760@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from davej@suse.de on Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:33:29AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:33:29AM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > So that means that pretty much 100% of development to any one area is being > > done by one person?!? That's cool, but doesn't it limit the speed at which > > forward progress can be made? > > The closest approximation my minds-eye can make of how things work > look something like this.. > > h h h h h > \ | | | / > m m m > \ |/ > ttt > | > l > > h - random j hacker working on same file/subsystem different goals > m - maintainer for file/subsys > t - "forked" tree maintainer (-ac, -dj, -aa etc..) > l - Linus > > Whilst development happens concurrently in parallel, the notion of > progress is somewhat serialised as changes work their way down to > Linus. In my message above, I specifically asked about any one area, asking if there was parallel development in that area. So far, noone has said "yes". If the answer was "yes", somebody in your fanin (nice ascii, BTW :) is merging. So the answer is either noone => no parallel development in any one area or someone If it is "someone", who is it? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/