Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:36:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:36:13 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:45736 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:35:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:35:18 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Oliver Xymoron Cc: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking Message-ID: <20011229153518.B21760@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Xymoron , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20011229150423.G19306@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from oxymoron@waste.org on Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 05:29:52PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 05:29:52PM -0600, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > > Is it really true that there are any significant number of patches > > submitted that don't even compile? > > No OK, so there are no significant numbers of patches that the patchbot will eliminate, by your admission. So what's the point? What is the problem you have solved? And where's the code? This sounds like you have whittled it down to a cgi-script of about 100 lines of perl. How about building it and demonstrating the usefulness rather than telling us how great it is going to be? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/