Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-42396-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:01:12 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
 Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@chromium.org>, Chia-I Wu
 <olvaffe@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst
 <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?=
 <christian.koenig@amd.com>, Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>, Steven Price
 <steven.price@arm.com>, Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>, Melissa Wen
 <mwen@igalia.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
 virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 22/30] drm/shmem-helper: Add common memory shrinker
Message-ID: <20240129100112.35c73f18@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240105184624.508603-23-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
References: <20240105184624.508603-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
	<20240105184624.508603-23-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Organization: Collabora
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri,  5 Jan 2024 21:46:16 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:

> +/**
> + * drm_gem_shmem_swapin_locked() - Moves shmem GEM back to memory and enables
> + *                                 hardware access to the memory.
> + * @shmem: shmem GEM object
> + *
> + * This function moves shmem GEM back to memory if it was previously evicted
> + * by the memory shrinker. The GEM is ready to use on success.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_gem_shmem_swapin_locked(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
> +
> +	if (!shmem->evicted)
> +		return 0;

Shouldn't we have a drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_update_lru_locked() even if
the object wasn't evicted, such that idle->busy transition moves the BO
to the list tail?

> +
> +	err = drm_gem_shmem_acquire_pages(shmem);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	shmem->evicted = false;
> +
> +	drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_update_lru_locked(shmem);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_swapin_locked);
> +