Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S287279AbRL2Xps>; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:45:48 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S287268AbRL2Xpj>; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:45:39 -0500
Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:50856 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S287260AbRL2XpV>;
	Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:45:21 -0500
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:45:20 -0800
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Timothy Covell <timothy.covell@ashavan.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Linux Bug Tracking & Feature Tracking DB
Message-ID: <20011229154520.D21760@work.bitmover.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>,
	Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
	Timothy Covell <timothy.covell@ashavan.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200112290657.fBT6vMSr008000@svr3.applink.net> <20011229105525.C19306@work.bitmover.com> <3C2E14AB.69CEA694@gmx.de> <E16KRjh-0000GP-00@starship.berlin> <3C2E4934.D582AB91@gmx.de> <20011229150247.A21733@work.bitmover.com> <3C2E51E9.A9B279D8@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <3C2E51E9.A9B279D8@gmx.de>; from froese@gmx.de on Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 12:29:45AM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> After that I heard nothing more from you.  I got the impression that a
> libc5 system was not commercially interesting enough...

Huh.  Well, it's easy enough to add that to the list of build machines, 
I think I can build libc5 binaries on redhat52, and we support that.

> > And, it would be nice if you raised the issue with us rather than the
> > kernel list, they aren't going to build your BK image for you.
> 
> I asked nobody to build a BK image for me.  You are constantly misusing
> the lkml as a BK promotion facility.  

If you feel that way, might I kindly suggest you add a simple rule to your
procmail filters and spare yourself (and the rest of the world) some pain?
I can show you how to do it if you don't know how, it would be no problem.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/