Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d1aa:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id ba42csp498325rdb; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:35:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxfkZI3mrV9cetVB6S1BwdpnOCdbZ1gVUGu8qMOsDesnVOY4mj2uJZab8VZrvF/5ogL3JP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:63a7:b0:176:ac69:8834 with SMTP id k39-20020a05635863a700b00176ac698834mr3450842rwh.54.1706546115704; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:35:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1706546115; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CW1DqHUanOIbVfGAsSeGj2e63YtiK4dGXb7z+la/+gu7MVUkZYc+FaaNMxPtdkt/ja coHFeUJbggJuA+pT/eIoZ+5sG8r7nlq9bOQn64W3gA5+rIH86OHgBXWRaKg6pdG/cE+t XOtquqYQ5riFr1SFtwutbN6ZYllPFp5hnol4SGqqUPaP7ixvVny1X0s9SYIpi73Eibtj lSxcz2t3IdXHfrhzrlirQFWtEhZl2OCnFRZfqTw4LQp5xtNg+HNamfdro9rWuEQPA7+A BSMJlzO42CyoS87ouTPxM4xkLn01LHJWz6Mr1mbpUcJfqtFzE8kDNus4ZJhX7poTlhyb YdYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=AD593rV9BYpZh6aYC+o8INGWhw/9bnD6DD2PKSudpDQ=; fh=+tfBzBAkLF7qlE4HyxcUgjtICIff7gH1yvPw3m7VUpE=; b=c7JmWzv/xH3N/qEsIyx4LG7hKEDpz1HfMMxUNhULkagBt1i7GrteKLyvL/g8004q// ET5+kVQUso6jtbsc//0/NFxKHs+Gwyn2spbR74n4fq0DN1pTm0SctNqpCft3bnqCx86s 5JR5P/y31aQ7O2TOy61DO1H2pifbGkXPc84fmyztozl2ydsCAIOu25dn4JMzgPcs4rlq CrJbjBhq8CngA/WwAeeg1mgBNALoD2VQ9DOrDP3IfBA0Pldj8REe78VYnjmFnWShDKtp uAUZFlIPY1aQcKtLq8k4bivTKhqo+dtEZEdAottVZ9VzfDOhsehOVqLDPvrXGh9dMSVR /N8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-43104-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-43104-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z22-20020a63e116000000b005ce025116bbsi5728740pgh.858.2024.01.29.08.35.15 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-43104-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=arm.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=arm.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-43104-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-43104-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD179283BBD for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C499515958B; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA2415956D; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706545852; cv=none; b=dv/jj1WY1+0Q6DI+oHEyFO2N2E1a8qrAnip93s7JBYfTnw+CJy02JlmaQvi4nBrE+KN1yxXNSCdJAa9ayfwPuQ8NyNknlZP2TuQpBPhWr/BN1vp/C8oJomSVmT+qRhSNht3xiXYTAA4f9YX6sR7DOUY2brGSXL0+cuEZMWPWSeE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706545852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W6TMqRtC+7055PVNc/k+MoT8M6gVLJlYB+nOkTGTGBE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kZLV/jwypAnlWnIwyo1rB/V4RWgCDrWGVUx6EnIhxphpsbIfj6CHOb63gfxyJSTvpqvYGBttjl5ERr08+ltWP17gARWiAmF50GfSkKw9XLSLgFXzs9DWvQT00fPpjpj9i8eYd2iha4IJZeaL5GTM+Y5R8V2pxQSmq6o9/4y5eQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95ADA7; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.78.35]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C67DC3F738; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:30:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:30:43 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: Cristian Marussi , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Oleksii Moisieiev , Linus Walleij , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, AKASHI Takahiro , Peng Fan , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Message-ID: <20240129163043.if5jj4kyacqfe2n5@bogus> References: <20240121-pinctrl-scmi-v3-0-8d94ba79dca8@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 08:36:50PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, Cristian > > Would you pick up patch 1-4? I will for v6.9 sometime. > And for i.MX95 OEM extenstion, do you have any suggestions? > I have two points: > 1. use vendor compatible. This would also benefit when supporting vendor > protocol. May be, but that was never on plate for standard protocols. So I don't like that approach either. > 2. Introduce a property saying supporting-generic-pinconf > I am not sure what you mean by that. But that doesn't sound right especial in context of SCMI. So I would say no. > How do you think? > I don't have any other suggestions than fix your driver to use the pinmux properly with features in the upstream pinmux subsystem. -- Regards, Sudeep